2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0266462303000497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Adherence to Guidelines in General Practice

Abstract: Patient characteristics have a greater influence on prescribing behavior than general practitioner characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial identification of relevant attributes was based predominantly on findings from an earlier survey of Norwegian doctors' adherence to guidelines (Carlsen & Aakvik, 2006;Carlsen & Norheim, 2008), existing international research on both prioritization and guidelines (Carlsen & Norheim, 2005;Eccles & Grimshaw, 2004;Farquhar et al, 2002;Stewart et al, 2003;Strech et al, 2008), as well as theoretical expertise and practical experience (with DCEs in general and with conducting DCEs in different local contexts) in the international research team. The choice models applied in the analysis rely on the assumption that respondents are able to make trade-offs between attributes and their levels in order to maximise utility.…”
Section: Attribute and Level Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial identification of relevant attributes was based predominantly on findings from an earlier survey of Norwegian doctors' adherence to guidelines (Carlsen & Aakvik, 2006;Carlsen & Norheim, 2008), existing international research on both prioritization and guidelines (Carlsen & Norheim, 2005;Eccles & Grimshaw, 2004;Farquhar et al, 2002;Stewart et al, 2003;Strech et al, 2008), as well as theoretical expertise and practical experience (with DCEs in general and with conducting DCEs in different local contexts) in the international research team. The choice models applied in the analysis rely on the assumption that respondents are able to make trade-offs between attributes and their levels in order to maximise utility.…”
Section: Attribute and Level Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[5][6][7]11 The present findings offer reasons as to why some GPs do not follow guidelines; these mainly relate to individual patient needs. The findings fit well with studies of why evidence is not implemented in general practice, [37][38][39] and echo the critique repeatedly made of evidence-based medicine compared with experience-based knowledge.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] A recent review of quantitative studies of GPs' attitudes to implementation provides an overview of the frequency and distribution of attitudinal barriers to guidelines, but does not offer an understanding of what underpins these. 11 While there have been several qualitative studies exploring GPs' attitudes towards guidelines, there has been no attempt to review and synthesise their findings systematically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When indicators are used in this manner, however, it is essential to recognize that deviations from guideline recommended care often may be appropriate. The clinical complexities of individual patients, such as somatic or psychiatric comorbidities and past adverse reaction to medications may significantly alter treatment choices available to individual patients and thus explain lack of adherence to guideline recommendations (33,34). Also, patient preferences may play an important role in clinical decisions regarding the use of particular psychopharmacologic agents, psychotherapies, or other treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%