Factors influencing adoption, innovation of new technology and decision-making by small-scale resource-constrained farmers: The perspective of farmers in lower Gweru, Zimbabwe

Abstract

A study was conducted in Lower Gweru Communal area of Zimbabwe to determine factors affecting small-scale resource-constrained farmers’ technology adoption and innovation processes. Specific objectives included determining circumstances when farmers consider learning about and adopting new technologies; documenting challenges faced by farmers in technology adoption; and determining the kind of support farmers require in adopting technologies or innovating. Multistage stratified random sampling was used to select a study sample of 256 farmers who participated in focus group discussions (FGDs). Additionally, semi-structured interviews (SSIs) with 200 farmers, selected from within the 256 FGD participants, were conducted to corroborate data collected in FGDs and participant observation. The study found that farmers were ready to learn and adopt new technologies when proposed technologies were (i) cheaper to acquire and use than their current technologies, (ii) easier and simpler to use, (iii) reduced labor requirements, and (iv) increased crop yields and/or animal productivity. Specifically, the study found high adoption rates of new technologies with traits similar to the farmers’ traditional practices such as conservation agriculture (with a 90% adoption rate) and thermal composts (with a 78% adoption rate). In terms of challenges, farmers were hampered mainly by lack of capital to acquire new technologies and lack of access to information, credit facilities and markets. In terms of support, in addition to capital and issues of access, farmers preferred to be actively involved in defining problems and developing solutions, technologies and innovations. Rather than being mere beneficiaries of new technologies developed by others, they want to be included in processes such as field-based participatory learning extension and innovation projects. In keeping with their self-perception as businessmen and women, perhaps most significantly, this study has reaffirmed that small-scale farmers, despite their educational limitations, their age, their constrained circumstances, and their risk profiles – are conscious and deliberate decision-makers. They are rational in their approach to adoption of technology, but are dominated by factors of cost, impact on income, and, of greatest influence, risk. Key words: extension, innovation, indigenous technologies, learning, perception, small-scale farmers, technology adoption

Evaluation of the Role of Small-Scale Farmers in Soil and Water Conservation Management in the Context of Climate Change

“…Cattle are the main source of power for tilling the land and other farm operations [11,23]. However, about 40% of the small-scale farmers do not own cattle and must hire them for the required operations [23]. This is consistent with FGDs' findings, where farmers highlighted that some farmers owning implements but without cattle enter into reciprocal cooperative arrangements with farmers who have cattle but lack some implements for tillage and cultivation purposes.…”

“…Lack of access to agricultural information, particularly farm management information, is a common characteristic of small-scale farmers [22,23]. In Zimbabwe, they are particularly reliant on extension workers, other farmers through their farmers' clubs and, to a small extent, radio [18,22,23].…”

“…Cattle are the main source of power for tilling the land and other farm operations [11,23]. However, about 40% of the small-scale farmers do not own cattle and must hire them for the required operations [23].…”

“…Most small-scale farmers depend on their own indigenous knowledge generated through many years of farming experience in their own communities to guide crop Evaluation of the Role of Small-Scale Farmers in Soil and Water Conservation Management… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108889 management decisions [18,22,23,25] (Table 2). Although reliable, indigenous knowledge keeps farmers operating at low levels of productivity [11].…”

Knowledge sharing behavior among farmers in Indonesia: Does social capital matter?

“…However, some scholars offered different solutions. For instance, people who live in rural areas need to build communication, interaction, share value and resources, and trust each other [4,5]. Over a decade, agriculture has had a crucial role in enhancing 9.7 billion people by 2050 and contributing to 4% of GDP in some developing countries [6].…”