2010
DOI: 10.1331/japha.2010.09089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing community pharmacists' enrollment in a state prescription monitoring program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12,32,33] A recent report by the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Center of Excellence at Brandeis estimated a median drug program registration rate of 35 percent among licensed prescribers who prescribed at least one controlled substance in the period 2010–12. [18] The limited effect of implementation that we found on overall opioid and pain medication prescribing can be partly explained by this low take-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,32,33] A recent report by the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Center of Excellence at Brandeis estimated a median drug program registration rate of 35 percent among licensed prescribers who prescribed at least one controlled substance in the period 2010–12. [18] The limited effect of implementation that we found on overall opioid and pain medication prescribing can be partly explained by this low take-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigators concluded that 40% of the physicians who participated in the study had not heard of the PDMP. Of those that had, only 11% had requested information from the database, 60% Another survey study reviewed was one done by Ulbrich, Clark, Green, Porter, and Bennett (2010). This study surveyed pharmacists in Ohio in 2008 on factors influencing their enrollment in a state PDMP.…”
Section: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives On Pdmpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall response rate to the survey of 8.7% was low, however, surveys using email or other electronic means to recruit participants are reported to typically have low response rates 40. Surveys of pharmacists using similar methodology have reported response rates ranging from 1.4% to 63.1%, although most were in the range of 3.5-15% 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49. From data provided in two surveys of Canadian pharmacists that used a variety of means of recruitment, including email, we estimated a response rate of approximately 4% for both surveys 41,42…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%