Factors Influencing Consumer Outcome Monitoring in Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices: Results from the National EBP Implementation Project

Marty, Doug; Rapp, Charles A.; McHugo, G; Whitley, Rob

doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0157-4

Cited by 41 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As noted by Drake et al (2009) 3 in a review of the implementation of evidence-based practices in schizophrenia, factors that are important to successfully disseminating psychosocial evidence-based practices include the state mental health authority's provision of leadership, funding, and practice standards [224][225][226] skilled mentoring and training; 227 site level administrative support 224,[227][228][229][230][231] and monitoring of fidelity and outcomes. 232,233 Until clinical service settings can administer evidence-based practices as they are developed and studied, the problem of the imperfect and inadequate application of research to clinical practice will persist.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 2009 Schizophrenia PORT Psychosocial Treatment Recommendations and Summary Statements

Dixon

Dickerson

Bellack

et al. 2009

Schizophrenia Bulletin

690

534

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 2009 Schizophrenia PORT Psychosocial Treatment Recommendations and Summary Statements

Dixon

Dickerson

Bellack

et al. 2009

Schizophrenia Bulletin

690

534

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, even though the dimension of Leadership Skills was rarely coded for the state level, other analyses of the National Implementing EBPs Project have clearly suggested the criticality of state leadership (Isett et al 2007(Isett et al , 2008. In addition, there is considerable evidence that efforts at the state-level were important in the areas of fidelity monitoring ) and outcome monitoring (Marty et al 2008), even though neither of these dimensions emerged as important from analysis of the NIEBPP data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY)

Finnerty

Rapp

Bond

et al. 2009

Community Ment Health J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

State mental health authorities have a leadership role in implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs), but few instruments are available to assess the impact of this role. We describe the development of the State Mental Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY), a behaviorally anchored instrument designed to assess state-level facilitating conditions associated with successful implementation of EBPs in community mental health centers. The SHAY assesses the SMHA role in seven domains: Planning, Financing, Training, Leadership, Policies and Regulations, Quality Improvement, and Stakeholders. Preliminary evidence from the National Evidence-Based Practices Project partially supports the construct and criterion-oriented validity of this instrument for rating state-level activities supporting or blocking the implementation of evidence-based practices.

show abstract

“…It is necessary to collect and feedback outcome results to have evidence-based practice. Successful implementations of evidence-based practice depend largely on leadership and outcome monitoring [39]. This involves recognition that clinicians do not have the time to efficiently collect and monitor outcomes and require technology and staff infrastructure that facilitates this function.…”

Section: Outcome Monitoring and Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of Leadership in Narrowing the Gap between Science and Practice: Improving Treatment Outcomes at the Systems Level

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It's been well documented that health care does not reliably transfer what we know from science into clinical practice. As a result, Americans do not always receive the care suggested by the scientific evidence. Despite the best intentions of a dedicated and skilled healthcare workforce, this can often lead to poor clinical outcomes. As research and technology rapidly advance, this gap between science and practice appears to be widening. There is an increasing public concern about a lack of access to appropriate treatment, pervasiveness of unsafe practices, and wasteful uses of precious health care resources leading to suboptimum treatment outcomes. Leadership has a critical role in creating and sustaining the environment that supports health services for individuals and populations that increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge. Leadership has some responsibility to improve outcomes by insuring effective use of evidence-based treatment guidelines; measurement-based care; knowledge and skills management; care coordination; and information technologies. This paper addresses leadership issues in these components of a system's ability to improve treatment outcomes.

show abstract

Factors Influencing Consumer Outcome Monitoring in Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices: Results from the National EBP Implementation Project

Abstract: Results suggest that four interrelated factors contributed to whether agencies successfully implemented Outcome Monitoring-agency data collection methods, agency culture, practitioner skill, and how well "consumer outcomes" are defined.

Cited by 41 publications

References 12 publications

The 2009 Schizophrenia PORT Psychosocial Treatment Recommendations and Summary Statements

The 2009 Schizophrenia PORT Psychosocial Treatment Recommendations and Summary Statements

The State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY)

Role of Leadership in Narrowing the Gap between Science and Practice: Improving Treatment Outcomes at the Systems Level

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About