2022
DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2022.2052643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing crowdsourcing riders’ satisfaction based on online comments on real-time logistics platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the above that women riders are most concerned about reward order information, which agrees with the findings of Y. Zhang et al (2022). According to statistics, each rider is assigned about 100 orders every day, but 45 orders a day is the physiological limit of normal people, so women riders tend to choose orders with high reward amount to boost their profits.…”
Section: Ernie Categorization Modelsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen from the above that women riders are most concerned about reward order information, which agrees with the findings of Y. Zhang et al (2022). According to statistics, each rider is assigned about 100 orders every day, but 45 orders a day is the physiological limit of normal people, so women riders tend to choose orders with high reward amount to boost their profits.…”
Section: Ernie Categorization Modelsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Measuring sentence uncertainty to assess model complexity, indicates that lower perplexity signifies better generalization (Y. Zhang et al, 2022). Utilizing Python's sklearn for topic modeling on women riders' user-generated content and employing Gibbs sampling with 200 iterations, this study identifies an optimal topic count through perplexity variation.…”
Section: Topic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we note that the majority of the previous studies were carried out using the methods of questionnaire survey (e.g., Xiao and Ke [25]), case study (e.g., Mladenow et al [19]), or literature analysis (e.g., Rai et al [10]). The online review data of crowdworkers were rarely paid attention to (see Zhang and Shi [26] for a notable exception). Therefore, we use the text content mining software ROST-CM for data analysis to better explore the factors affecting crowdworkers' continuous participation in crowdsourcing logistics from the first perspective.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not conducive to the crowdworkers' continued participation. However, the relevant research (e.g., Huang et al [2]; Bin et al [7]; Liang et al [12]; Bin et al [15]; Guo et al [22]; Zhang et al [26]) ignores this vital factor.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%