2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improved quality of workmanship has helped to significantly reduce air leakages. In Estonia, prefabrication of timber-based wall structures has been shown to improve airtightness compared to on-site building practice [12] although the Czech study showed the opposite referring to the fact that workmanship quality of on-site building can be regionally very different [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The improved quality of workmanship has helped to significantly reduce air leakages. In Estonia, prefabrication of timber-based wall structures has been shown to improve airtightness compared to on-site building practice [12] although the Czech study showed the opposite referring to the fact that workmanship quality of on-site building can be regionally very different [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been achieved for timber-frame low-energy houses in Norway, where measured apartments had airtightness n 50 in the range of 0.5 to 1.3 h -1 [14]. In the Czech Republic, the assessment of 558 newer timber buildings also showed good airtightness with a mean air leakage rate of 1.11 m 3 /(h•m 2 ), a standard deviation below 0.9 m 3 /(h•m 2 ) and a sharp decrease relative to past values [15]. The key factor to low air leakages was the proper installation of a vapour barrier with good workmanship quality and similarly to previous studies of Estonian wooden buildings the compactness of the building envelope and the number of storeys did not have a significant effect on air leakage [12,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to multiple studies, envelope structures consisting of wood or steel frame have worse airtight results than those built of concrete, bricks, or masonry [11][12][13][14]. Moreover, there is a significant difference between prefabricated walls (higher airtightness) and those built on-site [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of the occurrence are, among others, the connection of a roof and external wall, the placement of facade and roof windows and external doors, the connection of a balcony with a ceiling, rims, and lintels, and the connection of a foundation wall with a floor on the ground and an external wall. To minimize the presence of thermal bridges, the continuity of the insulation should be maintained along the building envelope [4]. A seamless connection of the floor, wall, and roof thermal insulation should be designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%