1986
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0651522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Fungal Activity in Low Moisture Poultry Feeds

Abstract: Feed samples were collected from the feed mill and four growers from each of two commercial broiler companies. Two sets of samples were collected from the first, middle, and last feeders in each poultry house. Feed samples were analyzed for mean particle size, respiratory C0 2 , moisture, percent fines, and zinc concentration. A significant (P<.05) increase in fungal activity was noted as feed moved from the feed mill to the feeder pans. This increase was associated with an increase in fines and higher zinc co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these findings reinforce previous recommendations that: 1) feed residence time in a house be minimized (Good and Hamilton, 1981); 2) houses be properly ventilated to reduce ambient relative humidity (Jones, et al 1982); and 3) feeders be allowed to empty periodically to reduce fungal activity in feed (Jones and Hamilton, 1986). In addition, these findings reinforce previous recommendations that: 1) feed residence time in a house be minimized (Good and Hamilton, 1981); 2) houses be properly ventilated to reduce ambient relative humidity (Jones, et al 1982); and 3) feeders be allowed to empty periodically to reduce fungal activity in feed (Jones and Hamilton, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, these findings reinforce previous recommendations that: 1) feed residence time in a house be minimized (Good and Hamilton, 1981); 2) houses be properly ventilated to reduce ambient relative humidity (Jones, et al 1982); and 3) feeders be allowed to empty periodically to reduce fungal activity in feed (Jones and Hamilton, 1986). In addition, these findings reinforce previous recommendations that: 1) feed residence time in a house be minimized (Good and Hamilton, 1981); 2) houses be properly ventilated to reduce ambient relative humidity (Jones, et al 1982); and 3) feeders be allowed to empty periodically to reduce fungal activity in feed (Jones and Hamilton, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Respiratory C0 2 values reported here are lower than those reported earlier (Jones and Hamilton, 1986). This may be due to the fact that feed samples were adjusted to 25% moisture in the earlier study while they were adjusted to 20% in the present study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Guyana, feed companies are located near the capital city and feed is transported by trucks to other parts of the country. Pressure on the feed during transport reduces the feed into smaller particle sizes, which encourages the growth of fungus [ 25 ]. In addition, exposure to high relative humidity and long periods of storage are directly related to fungal contamination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of dispersion derives from the consideration that an inhibitor must be in physical contact with the fungus before inhibition can occur. It should be recalled that fungal activity in pelleted feed increases as the level of fines increases (Jones and Hamilton, 1986). To the extent that a smaller particle size causes an increase in the level of fines in pelleted feeds (an unknown and unstudied relationship), a decrease in particle size of feeds might not improve the effectiveness of inhibitors in lowering total fungal activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%