2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing half-cell potential measurement and its relationship with corrosion level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Half‐cell potential (HCP) is a simple and fast method, which is used for determining the probability of rebar corrosion in concrete before the appearance of damage on the exposed surface. This device measures the potential difference between the reference electrode and the rebar . The HCP of corrosion was measured in accordance with ASTM C876 using a canin + ™ device with a copper/copper (II) sulfate (Cu/CuSO4) reference electrode .…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Half‐cell potential (HCP) is a simple and fast method, which is used for determining the probability of rebar corrosion in concrete before the appearance of damage on the exposed surface. This device measures the potential difference between the reference electrode and the rebar . The HCP of corrosion was measured in accordance with ASTM C876 using a canin + ™ device with a copper/copper (II) sulfate (Cu/CuSO4) reference electrode .…”
Section: Experimental Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device measures the potential difference between the reference electrode and the rebar. 38,39 The HCP of corrosion was measured in accordance with ASTM C876 using a canin + ™ device with a copper/copper (II) sulfate (Cu/CuSO4) reference electrode. 40 A simple comparison of the half-cell potential data with the ASTM guideline on steel reinforcement could provide good insight on corrosion probability of rebar (see Table 7).…”
Section: Half-cell Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was reviewed of research works which comparatively evaluated the laboratory and field toward identifying technically relevant situations where the use of sacrificial anodes may or may not be a practical option for reinforcement protection in concrete structures [8,21]. Influences of concrete cover, chloride content, compressive strength and moisture content on the half-cell potential measurement in reinforced concrete structure was studied and the results reported that the half-cell potential decreased when chloride content and moisture content increased and it was found to be increased when compressive strength increased [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, it can be mentioned that the reason for lack of clarity in the effects of AEA on corrosion of RC is the method of evaluating the corrosion behavior of RC from the results of permeability test at which some significant errors may be included, or using half‐cell potential (HCP) and electrical resistivity (ER) tests, which are among the conventional methods of determining permeability and corrosion of concrete . The ER value generally states the corrosion progress in RC as a dependent parameter on the hardened cement paste, while the HCP value expresses the probability of the corrosion phenomenon . Therefore, it is not possible to determine the positive or negative effect of AEA on corrosion behavior of RC using these two methods, due to their insufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The ER value generally states the corrosion progress in RC as a dependent parameter on the hardened cement paste, 11 while the HCP value expresses the probability of the corrosion phenomenon. 13,14 Therefore, it is not possible to determine the positive or negative effect of AEA on corrosion behavior of RC using these two methods, due to their insufficient accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%