1984
DOI: 10.1080/0361697840080103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing Hispanic Student Retention Within the Community College

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20.5%, respectively); and (b) a smaller percentage of students who report coming from families with incomes between $24,001 and $75,000 (53.2% vs. 60.0%, respectively) and family incomes less than $24,000 (16.5% vs. 17.0%, respectively). As expected, the differences discussed here are consistent with the existing literature, which indicates that first-generation students and students from lower family social class are more likely to initiate their college career at the community college level (Cabrera et al, 2005;Cohen & Brawer, 1989Dougherty, 1987Dougherty, , 1992Lea et al, 1979;McCool, 1984;McDonough, 1997;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991;.…”
Section: Background and Demographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…20.5%, respectively); and (b) a smaller percentage of students who report coming from families with incomes between $24,001 and $75,000 (53.2% vs. 60.0%, respectively) and family incomes less than $24,000 (16.5% vs. 17.0%, respectively). As expected, the differences discussed here are consistent with the existing literature, which indicates that first-generation students and students from lower family social class are more likely to initiate their college career at the community college level (Cabrera et al, 2005;Cohen & Brawer, 1989Dougherty, 1987Dougherty, , 1992Lea et al, 1979;McCool, 1984;McDonough, 1997;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991;.…”
Section: Background and Demographic Variablessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The greatest differences in enrollment path among minority students, who were represented in larger percentages at four-year institutions, occurred among African American (19.9% vs. 9.9%, respectively) and Hispanic/Latino (6.6% vs. 2.0%, respectively) students. This difference runs contrary to that which was expected, given the current literature (Cabrera et al, 2005;Cohen & Brawer, 1989Dougherty, 1987Dougherty, , 1992Lea et al, 1979;McCool, 1984;McDonough, 1997;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991;. However, this difference may be due to a few possible factors.…”
Section: Background and Demographic Variablescontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations