Factors influencing labor productivity on construction sites

Abstract

Purpose – Productivity is a worldwide problem and efforts have been made over the last three decades or so to explore ways to increase the rate of productivity on construction sites. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the state of the art in productivity research and to present the findings of a survey into the factors that can impair productivity on site. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review is structured under five general headings: pre-construction activities; activities during construction; managerial and leadership issues; motivational factors; and organizational factors. In total, 46 determinants were extracted from the above headings and were assessed by 36 main contractors. Findings – The literature review revealed that while there has been an advancement in developing techniques and tools to improving productivity on site, more need to be done to invest in technology and innovation. The interview survey indicated that factors associated with pre-construction activities, namely, the “experience of the selected site and project managers,” “design errors,” “buildability of the design,” “project planning,” “communication,” “ leadership style” and “procurement method” as the most critical factors influencing site productivity. Other highly ranked factors are “mismanagement of material” and “the work environment.” Research limitations/implications – The survey is based on main contractors and thus not generalized to cover other sectors of the building team such as designers and engineers. Practical implications – Outcome of this research can be used to provide professionals and contractors guidance for focussing, acting upon and controlling the most significant factors perceived to influence the construction labor productivity (CLP) on site. Originality/value – First, reviewed the state of the art and trends in construction productivity research. Second, primary survey with industry experts to rank the relative importance of factors that can influence CLP on site.

Improving Construction Management Practice in the Gibraltar Construction Industry

“…In the existing literature, it was revealed that productivity has been growing at 1% every year and the efficiency of workers is about 40% in the construction sector (Prabhu & Ambika, 2013). The common causes of low producitivity include mismanagement of construction materials, design errors, communication problems and inexperience of project team members, among others (Dai et al, 2007;Naoum, 2016). Based on the causes of low productivity, it is evident that poor management of site activities and pre-construction phase are the main reasons for low productivity.…”

Causes of Low-Skilled Workers’ Performance in Construction Projects

“…Construction industry in many developing countries are greatly concerned with low level of skilled workers' productivity due to economic, social, physical and psychological related factors influencing the performance of the skilled workers [47]. Low productivity of skilled workers' is one of the most serious task facing the construc-tion industry especially in developing countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Hong Kong, and other states in South east Asia [40].…”

Input for Hybrid Simulation Modelling Construction Operations

“…The other option is to use survey research to uncover and prioritise the most important factors amongst those sourced via existing knowledge. See, for example, Naoum's [7] work, which considers 46 factors grouped into five categories (pre-construction, during construction, management, organisational, motivational and social). Several papers contain lengthy lists of factors, for instance, Dai et al [8] identified 83 (at project level, grouped into the following categories: supervisor direction, communication, safety, tools and consumables, materials, engineering drawing management, labour, foreman, superintendent, project management, construction equipment), while Tsehayae and Robinson Fayek [9] instead collected 169 factors (grouped according to levels: activity, project, organisational, provincial, national, global).…”