Factors Influencing Monkeypox Vaccination: A Cue to Policy Implementation

Rajkhowa, Priyobrat; Dsouza, Viola Savy; Kharel, Rashmi; Cauvery, K; Mallya, B Rashmi; Raksha, D S; Mrinalini, V; Sharma, Preejana; Pattanshetty, Sanjay; Narayanan, Prakash; Lahariya, Chandrakant; Brand, Helmut

doi:10.1007/s44197-023-00100-9

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, studies have leveraged Twitter data to gauge public sentiments during the COVID-19 pandemic, assisting in identifying prevalent themes and concerns. The insights derived from social media sentiment analysis are crucial for managing public opinion, addressing public issues, and conducting syndromic monitoring, marking a notable advancement in understanding public opinion dynamics (Lu et al, 2023;Ma et al, 2023;Puschmann & Powell, 2018;Rajkhowa et al, 2023). Hence, the capability to scrutinize and interpret social media data is imperative for various stakeholders, offering a novel lens to understand and influence public sentiments and decisions.…”

Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Does ChatGPT change artificial intelligence-enabled marketing capability? Social media investigation of public sentiment and usage

Ngo

2024

Global Media and China

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent advent of ChatGPT has stirred substantial attention and debates, potentially altering the dynamics across various industries, notably marketing. This pioneering study delves into the public reactions and applications of ChatGPT within marketing realms. Leveraging a text-mining methodology, a corpus of over 600,000 tweets harvested before and after ChatGPT’s launch from January 2021 to April 2023 was scrutinized to gauge public sentiment towards AI-incorporated tools in marketing, and to unearth the predominant themes within public discourse. Initial findings unveiled a buoyant public sentiment towards AI-facilitated tools, which however, ebbed in January 2023, driven by apprehensions regarding AI technology’s limitations and potential perils. Subsequent months witnessed a rebound in sentiment, stabilizing above the positive threshold, as Twitter users increasingly acknowledged ChatGPT’s prospective merits on employment and daily lives. However, compared to the period before the introduction of ChatGPT, there has been a decline in the general public’s sentiment towards AI in marketing. Furthermore, the analysis discerned a convergence in the core topics broached by the public concerning AI and ChatGPT’s ramifications on marketing. While the automation of mundane tasks and heightened customer experience were lauded, trepidations surrounding job displacement and the ethical quandaries of supplanting human labor with machines surfaced. This exposition recommends that enterprises meticulously assess the prospective impact of AI on their personnel, advocating for the judicious and ethical deployment of such emergent technologies.

show abstract

Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Does ChatGPT change artificial intelligence-enabled marketing capability? Social media investigation of public sentiment and usage

Ngo

2024

Global Media and China

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, to achieve optimal levels of community protection and prevent disease re-emergence, it is essential to understand the factors that influence vaccine acceptance [ 11 , 12 ]. Intention to receive a vaccine is influenced by a complex interplay of sociodemographic, cultural, psychological, and risk perception variables [ 13 , 14 ], highlighting the need for detailed research on population intention toward Mpox vaccination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, the objective of the present investigation is to determine the prevalence of the intention to receive the Mpox vaccine. These findings could contribute to the development of more effective communication strategies and public health policies, guiding the prevention of Mpox and providing relevant information to strengthen preparedness and response to possible future outbreaks [ 13 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta-analysis

León-Figueroa,

Barboza,

Valladares-Garrido

et al. 2024

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Immunization, as a preventive strategy against infectious diseases, has consolidated its position as a fundamental pillar in the field of public health. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of the intention to receive the monkeypox (Mpox) vaccine. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence was performed using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect) with a search strategy until July 24, 2023. Data analysis was performed in R software version 4.2.3. The quality of the included cross-sectional studies was assessed using the “JBI-MAStARI”. In addition, a subgroup analysis by population and continent was developed. Results Twenty-nine cross-sectional articles with a total sample of 52 658 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of intention to vaccinate against Mpox was 61% (95% CI: 53–69%; 52,658 participants; 29 studies; I2 = 100%). In the subgroup analysis, the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox according to continents was 64% (95% CI: 53–74%; 13,883 participants; 17 studies; I2 = 99%) in Asian countries, 43% (95% CI: 39–47%; 1538 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 53%) in African countries, 62% (95% CI: 45–78%; 35,811 participants; 6 studies; I2 = 99%) in European countries, and 63% (95% CI: 32–89%; 1426 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 99%) in American countries. In the subgroup analysis on the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox, according to study subjects, it was 54% (95% CI: 45–62%; 10,296 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 99%) in the general population, 57% (95% CI: 33–79%; 3333 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 99%) in health care workers, and 76% (95% CI: 70–82%; 39,029 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 98%) in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. In addition, as a secondary outcome, a prevalence of refusal of Mpox vaccination was found to be 22% (95% CI: 16–30%; 45,577 participants; 21 studies; I2 = 99%). Conclusion The study highlights the importance of recognizing regional and subgroup disparities in Mpox vaccine willingness and refusal. It emphasizes the importance of employing strategies to achieve widespread vaccination coverage and safeguard public health worldwide. Terms used Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI), Prospective International Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

show abstract

“…However, to achieve optimal levels of community protection and prevent disease re-emergence, it is essential to understand the factors that in uence vaccine acceptance (11,12). Intention to receive a vaccine is in uenced by a complex interplay of sociodemographic, cultural, psychological, and risk perception variables (13,14), highlighting the need for detailed research on population intention toward Mpox vaccination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, the objective of the present investigation is to determine the prevalence of the intention to receive the Mpox vaccine. These ndings could contribute to the development of more effective communication strategies and public health policies, guiding the prevention of Mpox and providing relevant information to strengthen preparedness and response to possible future outbreaks (13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta- analysis

León-Figueroa,

Barboza,

Valladares-Garrido

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Immunization, as a preventive strategy against infectious diseases, has consolidated its position as a fundamental pillar in the field of public health. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of intention to receive the monkeypox vaccine (Mpox). Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence was performed using five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect) with a search strategy until July 24, 2023. Data analysis was performed in R software version 4.2.3. The quality of the included cross-sectional studies was assessed using the "JBI-MAStARI". In addition, a subgroup analysis by study population and continent was developed. Results Twenty-nine cross-sectional articles with a total sample of 52 658 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of intention to vaccinate against Mpox was 61% (95% CI: 53–69%; 52658 participants; 29 studies; I2 = 100%). In the subgroup analysis on the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox according to continents was 64% (95% CI: 53–74%; 13883 participants; 17 studies; I2 = 99%) in Asian countries, 43% (95% CI: 39–47%; 1538 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 53%) in African countries, 62% (95% CI: 45–78%; 35811 participants; 6 studies; I2 = 99%) in European countries, and 63% (95% CI: 32–89%; 1426 participants; 3 studies; I2 = 99%) in American countries. In the subgroup analysis on the intention to be vaccinated against Mpox, according to study subjects it was 54% (95% CI: 45–62%; 10296 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 99%) in the general population, 57% (95% CI: 33–79%; 3333 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 99%) in health care workers, and 76% (95% CI: 70–82%;39029 participants; 8 studies; I2 = 98%) in the LGBTI community. In addition, as a secondary outcome, a prevalence of refusal of Mpox vaccination was found to be 22% (95% CI: 16–30%; 45577 participants; 21 studies; I2 = 99%). Conclusion The study highlights the importance of recognizing regional and subgroup disparities in Mpox vaccine willingness and refusal. It emphasizes the importance of employing strategies to achieve widespread vaccination coverage and safeguard public health worldwide. Terms used Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI), Prospective International Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

show abstract

Factors Influencing Monkeypox Vaccination: A Cue to Policy Implementation

Cited by 14 publications

References 33 publications

Does ChatGPT change artificial intelligence-enabled marketing capability? Social media investigation of public sentiment and usage

Does ChatGPT change artificial intelligence-enabled marketing capability? Social media investigation of public sentiment and usage

Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevalence of intentions to receive monkeypox vaccine. A systematic review and meta- analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About