2018
DOI: 10.1642/auk-18-49.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing Northern Bobwhite recruitment, with implications for population growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed lower survival for 30‐day (71%) and 90‐day (36%) post‐hatch periods compared to those reported in other studies (Puckett et al , Mueller et al , Suchy and Munkel ) but slightly higher than what was proposed as a minimum monthly period survival (67%) required for population stability (Sandercock et al ). Bobwhite abundance on our study area was stable during this study but exhibited significant annual swings in autumn density (McConnell et al ), supporting the minimum chick survival rate posited for population stability by Sandercock et al (). Despite intensive habitat management efforts on our study site, annual variation in chick survival was substantial, ranging from 14.6% to 76.9% for 90‐day survival periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We observed lower survival for 30‐day (71%) and 90‐day (36%) post‐hatch periods compared to those reported in other studies (Puckett et al , Mueller et al , Suchy and Munkel ) but slightly higher than what was proposed as a minimum monthly period survival (67%) required for population stability (Sandercock et al ). Bobwhite abundance on our study area was stable during this study but exhibited significant annual swings in autumn density (McConnell et al ), supporting the minimum chick survival rate posited for population stability by Sandercock et al (). Despite intensive habitat management efforts on our study site, annual variation in chick survival was substantial, ranging from 14.6% to 76.9% for 90‐day survival periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In our study, when chick survival rates were higher and lower than average (±95% CIs), such as in 2002 and 2007 (Fig. ), subsequent autumn abundance increased and decreased, respectively (McConnell et al ). As such, annual fluctuation in chick survival may be a more salient determinant of population growth than expected (Sandercock et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sandercock et al () used population modeling to impute that adult survival was the primary factor affecting population trends rather than variation in productivity in mostly declining populations. McConnell et al (), however, indicated that recruitment was more important than survival in a stable population. Thus, managers often reduce meso‐mammals in an attempt to increase reproductive success of bobwhites for purported increases in autumn recruitment and abundance (Stoddard , Côté and Sutherland , Newton ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our models were most realistic when density dependence was relatively strong. This is expected for a species with a life history such as that of the bobwhite (Fowler 1981, Guthery 2002 and density dependence has been estimated empirically (McConnell et al 2018, Yeiser et al 2018. For simplicity, we chose a linear form across all vital rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%