2004
DOI: 10.1357/0022240042880873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing organic carbon recycling and burial in Skagerrak sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
42
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
8
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this pattern has been previously observed (e.g. Forja et al 2004, Lansard et al 2008, other authors have found that benthic remineralization is mainly controlled by the quality, rather than the quantity, of sedimentary organic matter (Arnosti & Holmer 2003, Ståhl et al 2004a. Although not significantly, component 1 of the PCA was negatively associated with surface sediment C:N ratios, which are considered to be indicative of organic matter quality.…”
Section: Discussion N Regenerationcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Although this pattern has been previously observed (e.g. Forja et al 2004, Lansard et al 2008, other authors have found that benthic remineralization is mainly controlled by the quality, rather than the quantity, of sedimentary organic matter (Arnosti & Holmer 2003, Ståhl et al 2004a. Although not significantly, component 1 of the PCA was negatively associated with surface sediment C:N ratios, which are considered to be indicative of organic matter quality.…”
Section: Discussion N Regenerationcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…However, acknowledging seasonal (and interannual) variation in the production and the supply of organic material, adding our measurement of benthic carbon mineralization (*15 mmol m -2 day -1 ; Table 1) and the derived carbon preservation rate gives a total sedimentation rate of 161 g C m -2 year -1 which scale to the estimated sedimentation rate of Ansell (1974). Based on these figures we can calculate a carbon burial efficiency of *59 % which is consistent with the high sedimentation rate and substantial terrestrial inputs (Canfield 1994;Ståhl et al 2004;Blair and Aller 2012).…”
Section: Benthic Carbon and Nutrient Turnover In A Highly Irrigated Csupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Flux data from leaking chambers were discarded. A more detailed description of the landers is given in e.g., Ståhl et al (2004), and of the chambers and their hydrodynamics in e.g., Tengberg et al (2004). Benthic fluxes for each solute were calculated from the concentration change per unit of area and time in every chamber.…”
Section: Benthic In Situ Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%