Objective-To describe self-reported health status and quality of life (QOL) of ambulatory youths with cerebral palsy (CP) compared with sex-and age-matched typically developing youth (TDY).
Design-Prospective cross-sectional cohort comparison.
Setting-Community-based.Participants-A convenience sample of 81 youth with CP (age range, 10-13y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I through III and 30 TDY participated. They were recruited from 2 regional children's hospitals and 1 regional military medical center.
Interventions-Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures-Participants completed the Child Health Questionnaire-Child Form (CHQ-CF87) for health status and the Youth Quality of Life for QOL.Results-Youth with CP reported significantly lower health status than age-and sex-matched TDY in the following CHQ-CF87 subscales: role/social behavioral physical, bodily pain, physical function, and general health (CP mean rank, TDY mean rank,). There were significant differences across GMFCS levels. There were no significant differences in selfreported QOL.Conclusions-Self-reported health status, but not QOL, appears sensitive to the functional health issues experienced by ambulatory youth with CP. Pain management and psychosocial support may be indicated for them.
KeywordsCerebral palsy; Health status; Quality of life; Rehabilitation The types of cerebral palsy (CP) compatible with independent ambulation, hemiplegia, and diplegia, comprise 48% to 79% of all cases. 1 All ambulatory persons with CP experience limitations in walking and other physical activities. It is generally believed that people who experience such limitations have less than optimal quality of life (QOL); below normal health-related QOL (HRQOL) in youth with CP has been reported by parents and other "Quality of life," as defined by the WHO, is a broader construct than "health status" because it includes aspects of the social and physical environment that may or may not be affected by health or a treatment. 6 HRQOL is often applied as an outcome measure that focuses on the aspects of life and activity that are influenced by health conditions or services. Patrick and Chiang 9 suggested that "health status" and "health-related quality of life" are most useful in the context of assessment of health services and treatment efficacy, while "quality of life" measures should be used to evaluate environments and/or issues external to the context of health care.The literature on health and/or QOL in youth with CP has been primarily based on parental report and historically has combined the constructs of "health" with "QOL" in reporting CHQ data as HRQOL. Self-reported life experiences for youth with CP based on the current WHO definition of QOL, separate from health status or HRQOL, have not been documented. In this crosssectional study, our aim was to investigate health status unique from QOL of youth with CP (appendix 1) compared with an age-and sex-matched group of typically developing youth (TDY). This comparison group controls fo...