2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01482.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing poor visual outcome in patients treated with photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age‐related macular degeneration

Abstract: This study found no statistically significant association between lesion composition defined on fluorescein angiography and loss of visual acuity compared with previous studies. Factors associated with an increased rate of loss of 15 letters were increasing age of the patient, increasing lesion size and better baseline logMAR vision.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive results for predominantly classic subfoveal lesions in the TAP trial has since prompted a large number of studies ( Sharma et al 2004;Arias et al 2005;Michels et al 2005;Brown et al 2006;Heier et al 2006;Slakter et al 2006;Gelisken et al 2007) and retrospective (Essex et al 2003;Axer-Siegel et al 2004a;Frennesson & Nilsson 2004;Pawlak et al 2004;Wachtlin et al 2005;Potter et al 2008;Yang et al 2006;Ghanchi et al 2007;Manku et al 2007;Pece et al 2007;Sharp et al 2007). In several of these reports, PDT monotherapy was used as a The VIP, VIO and VIM trials examined the efficacy of PDT in patients whose lesions either did not meet the TAP Study inclusion criteria or who were included but required further study (Table 1).…”
Section: The Tap Study: Pdt In Predominantly Classic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive results for predominantly classic subfoveal lesions in the TAP trial has since prompted a large number of studies ( Sharma et al 2004;Arias et al 2005;Michels et al 2005;Brown et al 2006;Heier et al 2006;Slakter et al 2006;Gelisken et al 2007) and retrospective (Essex et al 2003;Axer-Siegel et al 2004a;Frennesson & Nilsson 2004;Pawlak et al 2004;Wachtlin et al 2005;Potter et al 2008;Yang et al 2006;Ghanchi et al 2007;Manku et al 2007;Pece et al 2007;Sharp et al 2007). In several of these reports, PDT monotherapy was used as a The VIP, VIO and VIM trials examined the efficacy of PDT in patients whose lesions either did not meet the TAP Study inclusion criteria or who were included but required further study (Table 1).…”
Section: The Tap Study: Pdt In Predominantly Classic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical applicability of our, recently reported, predictive outcomes [31,32] mainly concerns the opportunity to improve the eligibility criteria of standardized PDT-V, currently centered just on the morphological composition of CNV [7,8,[27][28][29][30]. A pre-operative assessment of individual genetic backgrounds for designated coagulation-balance polymorphisms should make possible a more rational selection of candidates to PDT-V which, at present, is especially utilized in combination with anti-VEGF drugs [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Current and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…baseline visual acuity and CNV size) were considered to explain the individually variable efficacy of PDT-V -- Fig. (1), this investigative approach has just partially improved the applicative criteria of verteporfin therapy [8,[27][28][29][30]. A new predictive scenario has been recently opened by the pharmacogenetic assessment of PDT-V efficacy profile, considering the role of coagulation-balance genetic backgrounds in changing its therapeutic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several ocular factors (i.e. baseline size of CNV and initial VA) have been examined as individual predictors of the variable PDT-V efficacy [127][128][129][130], these studies have been weakly contributed to an applicative optimization of this intriguing treatment. On the other hand, both Chan et al and Yang et al have interestingly reported the presence of a remarkable difference in CNV responsiveness to standardized PDT-V between Asian and Caucasian patients [131,132].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Action Of Pdt-vmentioning
confidence: 99%