1992
DOI: 10.1680/macr.1992.44.158.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing pull-off tests on concrete

Abstract: The pull-off technique has grown in popularity for testing the surface zone strength of concrete, and when used in conjunction with partial coring is particularly suitable for the bond testing of repairs. Theoretical and laboratory experimental studies have been undertaken to examine a number of important practical factors which influence the results obtained during surface and partially cored pull-off tests. Finite-element methods were used to analyse failure zone stress distributions. Disc material and propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These aspects were: the pull-off strength; the surface roughness; the rupture strength; the wear resistance and the corrosion resistance. 4 To determine the strength of the bond between the CO 2 and HPDL generated glazes on the OPC surface and the concrete substrate itself, pull-off tests were conducted based on the work of Bungey et al [1] and Carino [2]. For experimental convenience the concrete was prepared as relatively small area samples (25 mm x 25 mm).…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects were: the pull-off strength; the surface roughness; the rupture strength; the wear resistance and the corrosion resistance. 4 To determine the strength of the bond between the CO 2 and HPDL generated glazes on the OPC surface and the concrete substrate itself, pull-off tests were conducted based on the work of Bungey et al [1] and Carino [2]. For experimental convenience the concrete was prepared as relatively small area samples (25 mm x 25 mm).…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to mention that European standards EN 1015-12 [22] and EN 1348 [23] recommend the use of metallic discs with thickness higher than 1 cm. Bungey et al [29] refer 2 cm for steel metallic discs. Therefore, a constant (1 to 2 cm) thickness of metallic discs should be used in pull-off tests on ceramic cladding adhesion testing.…”
Section: Influence Of Metallic Disc Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is time consuming due to the delay time of the curing of the resin used for bonding the steel disc. Moreover, results can be influenced by variation on the rupture surface, the orientation and position of the aggregate onto the disc, the disc material, diameter, and thickness, the backpressure system, and also the speed of load application [6][7][8]. The tested surface in each of the measuring places is damaged and the efficiency of this method depends on the number of measuring places.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%