Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences

Abstract

BackgroundIn a research context, self-management solutions, which may range from simple book diaries to complex telehealth packages, designed to facilitate patients in managing their long-term conditions, have often shown cost-effectiveness, but their implementation in practice has frequently been challenging.MethodsWe conducted an interpretive qualitative synthesis of relevant articles identified through systematic searches of bibliographic databases in July 2014. We searched PubMed (Medline/NLM), Web of Science, LISTA (EBSCO), CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO. Coding and analysis was inductive, using the framework method to code and to categorise themes. We took a sensemaking approach to the interpretation of findings.ResultsFifty-eight articles were selected for synthesis. Results showed that during adoption, factors identified as facilitators by some were experienced as barriers by others, and facilitators could change to barriers for the same adopter, depending on how adopters rationalise the solutions within their context when making decisions about (retaining) adoption. Sometimes, when adopters saw and experienced benefits of a solution, they continued using the solution but changed their minds when they could no longer see the benefits. Thus, adopters placed a positive value on the solution if they could constructively rationalise it (which increased adoption) and attached a negative rationale (decreasing adoption) if the solution did not meet their expectations. Key factors that influenced the way adopters rationalised the solutions consisted of costs and the added value of the solution to them and moral, social, motivational and cultural factors.ConclusionsConsidering ‘barriers’ and ‘facilitators’ for implementation may be too simplistic. Implementers could instead iteratively re-evaluate how potential facilitators and barriers are being experienced by adopters throughout the implementation process, to help adopters to retain constructive evaluations of the solution. Implementers need to pay attention to factors including (a) cost: how much resource will the intervention cost the patient or professional; (b) moral: to what extent will people adhere because they want to be ‘good’ patients and professionals; (c) social: the expectations of patients and professionals regarding the interactive support they will receive; (d) motivational: motivations to engage with the intervention and (e) cultural: how patients and professionals learn and integrate new skills into their daily routines, practices and cultures.

Patients’ experiences of therapeutic jaw exercises in the treatment of masticatory myofascial pain—A postal questionnaire study

“…The importance of how to further the treatment's significance in relation to, for example cost, motivational and social aspects has been stressed. 20 In the present study, the responders reported that it was difficult to find the time to do the jaw exercises in the middle of the day. This might be explained by a combination of stress at work and the fact that a majority of patients did not want to do the exercises among other people.…”

“…There are many different factors that may influence a patient's acceptance and adoption of a self‐management regime. The importance of how to further the treatment's significance in relation to, for example cost, motivational and social aspects has been stressed . In the present study, the responders reported that it was difficult to find the time to do the jaw exercises in the middle of the day.…”

Making sense of blood glucose data and self‐management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study

“…Individuals’ adherence to such changes varies with their perceived health locus of control, diabetes self‐efficacy and length of time with their type 2 diabetes diagnosis (Klinovszky, Kiss, Papp‐Zipernovszky, Lengyel, & Buzás, 2019). Facilitators and barriers to effective diabetes self‐management behaviours vary among individuals and can change over time (Harvey, Dopson, McManus, & Powell, 2015). To help individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop and maintain effective self‐management regimens, it is essential we deepen our understanding of what guides their decisions.…”

Factors influencing the improvement of self-management behavior in hemodialysis patients

“…Our results showed that psychosocial support, patient education programs, active participation of family members and healthcare providers lead to success of selfmanagement in patients. Harvey et al reported that patients perceived that lack of support and weakness in communication with clinicians did not encourage them to be good in sustaining selfmanagement (25).…”