2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2008.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the development and implementation of advanced and consultant radiographer practice – A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average consultant radiographer spends over 50% of their time reporting, in keeping with national guidance on their clinical practice. 30 Lack of time to report has been a longstanding issue for radiographers; 31 although this problem appears to have reduced, there remain inconsistencies in job planning and staff utilization across the UK. Those who were not reporting cited staff shortages and time constraints to be the primary reasons, echoing a recent study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average consultant radiographer spends over 50% of their time reporting, in keeping with national guidance on their clinical practice. 30 Lack of time to report has been a longstanding issue for radiographers; 31 although this problem appears to have reduced, there remain inconsistencies in job planning and staff utilization across the UK. Those who were not reporting cited staff shortages and time constraints to be the primary reasons, echoing a recent study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government policies and a shortage of radiologists in the UK have facilitated the development of the professional role for some radiographers, who have moved on to an advanced or consulting level. These areas are available for a minority of radiographers; the majority still work with imaging or radiotherapy (9,10,11,12,13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been precedence in the past from studies in X-Ray 47,50,57,58,59 , CT 60 and fluoroscopy 61 to establish the cost effectiveness of radiographers reporting. This study predisposes any additional cost between the interventions could not be appropriately calculated to Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratios (ICER) or Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as the patient sample group data did not recorded the impact of the intervention on treatment and management plans, as evidence from discrepancy audit meetings were unavailable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%