Whirling disease is the result of acute infections by Myxobolus cerebralis, a myxozoan parasite that was introduced to the United States over 50 years ago. The life cycle of M. cerebralis involves two alternate hosts, a trout and the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex. It is a widely held belief that M. cerebralis epizootics are unlikely in Pennsylvania, though no investigation has been undertaken to provide an explanation for this hypothesis. In this study, we chose two streams known to be enzootic for M. cerebralis to investigate the spatial distribution and abundance of the tubificid host. Tubij2x tubifx was not widely distributed in either stream, and the density of this species was strongly related to proximity to gross organic enrichment. Zlyodrilus templetoni, a likely competitor, was well distributed and dominant in both systems. We suggest that the restricted distribution and abundance of T. tubifex in Pennsylvania may limit transmission of M. cerebralis between infected worms and susceptible trout and may explain why whirling disease epizootics have not recently been observed in Pennsylvania streams enzootic for M. cerebralis.
INTRODUCTIONWhirling disease of salmonids is the result of acute infections by Mjrxobolus cerebralis, a microparasite of the phylum Myxozoa. The life cycle of M. cerebralis involves infection of two obligate hosts, a trout and the oligochaete Tubifx tubifex. M. cerebralis replicates in both hosts, and during transmission progeny are released into the aquatic environment as free-living, infective spores referred to as myxospores and triactinomyxons (Hedrick et al. 1998). Myxospores develop in fish and are released upon