Factors Influencing the Intrinsic Seismic Risk of Open Spaces in Existing Built Environments: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Open spaces (OSs), such as streets, squares, and green areas, in existing built environments (BEs) are key places in disaster risk management. The seismic risk in the OSs is strictly related to BE characteristics. Scientific literature mainly focuses on extrinsic factors affecting risk, which are related to BE elements on the OSs frontier (e.g., buildings) that could cause indirect effects on the OSs. Conversely, just a few risk assessment studies consider intrinsic factors, which are related to OS elements that could suffer direct effects. Moreover, synoptic studies on such factors are still missing. Through literature-based research, the paper identifies specific factors influencing seismic risk in the OSs, focusing notably on intrinsic vulnerability. The literature review methodology includes both a systematic review from Scopus databases and a traditional bibliographic search using snowball analysis. According to the final selected papers, risk factors are classified into five categories of OS characteristics: morpho-typology; physical; construction; use and users; and context. Statistical analysis of the categories’ recurrence in the final papers firstly allows current literature gaps to be defined. The results also provide a preliminary OSs risk index weighting each category in terms of such recurrences, thus representing a first useful step to support non-expert stakeholders in a preliminary assessment of priorities to define the seismic risk of Oss.

A Bibliometric Review on Safety Risk Assessment of Construction Based on CiteSpace Software and WoS Database

“…Cluster #9 is "seismic". Seismic activity is an essential factor in risk assessment [83,84]. The assessed factors include the construction site's location, the likelihood of seismic activity, and the potential intensity of the earthquake [85].…”

A survey form for the characterization of the historical built environment prone to multi-risks

“…For example, temporary elements (e.g., dehors, canopy), cultural or artistical elements (e.g., fountains, monuments, statues, archaeological sites), and green areas. The presence of natural or human-made underground cavities was also included, considering their role in amplifying the local seismic frequency spectrum [22].…”

“…Considering the SLODs, the hazard level is affected by the climatic zone classification (e.g., maximum temperatures, solar exposure, and wind velocity) [24]. Conversely, the presence of lifeline utilities was considered for the SUODs that, although they provide essential infrastructure services to the community, are susceptible to damages and can compromise the evacuation paths [22]. Moreover, this section also reported the multi-hazard potential of the area (according to the national classification for each type of risk), considering that the interaction between disasters can cause collateral risk conditions (e.g., landslides, explosions, floods) [13].…”

EQ-DIRECTION Procedure towards an Improved Urban Seismic Resilience: Application to the Pilot Case Study of Sanremo Municipality

“…In other words, the state of the system and the actions taken throughout each phase of the disaster risk management cycle (that includes mitigation, preparedness response, and recovery) determine how resilient the urban system would be [15]. Therefore, carrying out interventions to lessen the built environment's vulnerability before the event [16,17], planning an effective emergency management strategy [18], and executing quick and efficient recovery [19] are all effective measures that raise the system's resilience. The actions performed in each phase not only affect the overall resilience of the urban system but also the ability of the urban system in subsequent phases to continue functioning and take the planned actions [20].…”