2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Patterns of Injuries and Outcomes in Car versus Car Crashes Compared to Sport Utility, Van, or Pick-up Truck versus Car Crashes: Crash Injury Research Engineering Network Study

Abstract: Both F and L crashes between sedans and SUVT with a high mass ratio shift the pattern of injury cephalad with increased thorax and intrathoracic organ injuries, and more severe TBI. These data suggest that improved head and thorax side-impact buffering and design features which transmit MVC forces from the higher front end of the larger mass SUVT to the frame of the sedan may better protect sedan occupants from side-impacts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, the NTDB lacks information on the speed of motor vehicles at the time of crash; therefore, we could not control for this potential confounder. 16 Future studies should identify the possible effect of speed at the time of impact on the occurrence of PNIs. Sixth, the NTDB does not provide any information on the postacute course of the patients or the percentage of patients who underwent surgical treatment for their PNIs (most of which happens in a delayed fashion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, the NTDB lacks information on the speed of motor vehicles at the time of crash; therefore, we could not control for this potential confounder. 16 Future studies should identify the possible effect of speed at the time of impact on the occurrence of PNIs. Sixth, the NTDB does not provide any information on the postacute course of the patients or the percentage of patients who underwent surgical treatment for their PNIs (most of which happens in a delayed fashion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,38,40 Compared with frontal collisions, lateral-impact MVCs have been associated with an increase in the odds of death (OR 12.86) and a higher incidence of severe brain and pelvic injuries. 34,36 In our study, we found that lateral-impact collisions did not differ from frontal collisions with respect to either the risk or the severity of neurological injury. The increased protection in lateral-impact MVCs found in this study may be related to the increased deployment of side airbags in more recently manufactured motor vehicles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial impact points are often lower extremities, resulting in fractures of the ankle, around the knee, or fracture of the femur. There are many factors that contribute to the amount of force transferred to specific anatomical structures including change in velocity at impact, timing of impact, degree of compartment intrusion, configuration of occupant and safety devices (Siegel et al, 2001;Bansal et al, 2009;Crandall et al, 1998;Nordhoff, 2004;Chong et al, 2007) Change in velocity at time of impact is closely associated with severity of injury as well as incidence of lower extremity injury (Figure 7) (Chong et al, 2007;Dischinger et al, 1998, Rupp & Scheider, 2004. The effect of timing is illustrated in the different degree of injury sustained when knee contact with instrument panel occurs during deceleration when the instrument panel may still be moving forward causing the localized contact velocity to be lower than impacts that occur once the car has stopped moving (Mackay, 1992).…”
Section: Motor Vehicle Collisionmentioning
confidence: 99%