1995
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00065-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the success of transcervical insemination in Merino ewes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological characteristics of the ewe such as age, breed, individual variation in cervical structure, parity, season, and reproductive history may all contribute to this variability. Windsor et al, [36] and Szabados et al, [13] have shown a positive correlation between ewe parity and the depth of cervical penetration using an AI catheter and presently the method is not recommended for nulliparous ewes. Kaabi et al, [28] found a significant difference in cervical penetrability between the Assuf, Churra, Castellana and Merino breeds; upon a morphometric analysis of the cervices from these breeds, they noticed significant breedrelated differences in cervical length, width, number of folds, and the distance between folds.…”
Section: The Guelph System For Tcaimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physiological characteristics of the ewe such as age, breed, individual variation in cervical structure, parity, season, and reproductive history may all contribute to this variability. Windsor et al, [36] and Szabados et al, [13] have shown a positive correlation between ewe parity and the depth of cervical penetration using an AI catheter and presently the method is not recommended for nulliparous ewes. Kaabi et al, [28] found a significant difference in cervical penetrability between the Assuf, Churra, Castellana and Merino breeds; upon a morphometric analysis of the cervices from these breeds, they noticed significant breedrelated differences in cervical length, width, number of folds, and the distance between folds.…”
Section: The Guelph System For Tcaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this and similar methods ranged from 44% to 91% [13,18,20,26,29,[34][35][36][37]. Reports on the total time taken to complete the procedure are 0.5 min to 4.8 min.…”
Section: The Guelph System For Tcaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Windsor et al [15] found a significant effect of ewe parity on cervical penetration rates in synchronized ewes during seasonal anestrus but not in normally cycling, non-synchronized ewes in the breeding season. Some studies have reported a correlation between the breed and cervical penetrability [16], which may be due to the morphological differences in cervical structure between various genotypes of ewes; in general, the breeds with higher cervical complexity exhibited a lower degree of cervical penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta técnica visa à deposição do sêmen no interior da cérvice em diferentes graus de profundidade: superficial, média ou profunda, de acordo com a quantidade de anéis cervicais transpassados, portanto, é diretamente influenciada por fatores como momento do estro, idade, ordem de parição (Windsor, 1995). É uma técnica bem difundida por ser rápida e relativamente fácil, de pouca manipulação; preconiza-se a posição bipedal anterior para esta técnica, com a possibilidade de uso de cavalete, ou mesmo o uso da posição quadrupedal (Oliveira & Fonseca, 2013).…”
Section: Cervicalunclassified