2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03194155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the variation in capture rates of shrews in southern California, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 22 species we captured using drift fences, only northern short‐tailed shrews and pygmy and masked shrews had detection probabilities ≥0.15. Detection probabilities for those species were positively associated with precipitation events, a phenomenon documented for some shrew species (Brannon 2002, Umetsu et al 2006) but not others (Laakkonen et al 2003, Whittaker and Feldhamer 2005). We were 3 times more likely to detect pygmy and masked shrews and 30 times more likely to detect northern short‐tailed shrews when sampling on days with 10 mm of precipitation within a 24‐hr period compared to days without rain (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Of the 22 species we captured using drift fences, only northern short‐tailed shrews and pygmy and masked shrews had detection probabilities ≥0.15. Detection probabilities for those species were positively associated with precipitation events, a phenomenon documented for some shrew species (Brannon 2002, Umetsu et al 2006) but not others (Laakkonen et al 2003, Whittaker and Feldhamer 2005). We were 3 times more likely to detect pygmy and masked shrews and 30 times more likely to detect northern short‐tailed shrews when sampling on days with 10 mm of precipitation within a 24‐hr period compared to days without rain (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%