2014
DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s38989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors involved in treatment preference in patients with renal cancer: pazopanib versus sunitinib

Abstract: The last decade has seen a surge in the treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and life expectancies are now approaching 3 years from diagnosis. There is some suggestion that, for now at least, we may have reached a plateau in efficacy. Patients are often stable and on treatment for years rather than months. Attention has therefore shifted to a focus on patient preference rather than reported frequency of toxicities. The standard first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cancer is eit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the PISCES study (a patient preference study), HRQoL was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale: pazopanib obtained a 2.5-point higher score than sunitinib (95% CI: 0.92–4.07; p < 0.002). The Supplementary Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQLQ) questionnaire also showed better results with pazopanib in 5 parameters [ 37 , 38 ]. Finally, in a post-hoc analysis, a trend towards a lower risk of experiencing a > 20% loss of QoL was observed with pazopanib compared to placebo [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PISCES study (a patient preference study), HRQoL was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale: pazopanib obtained a 2.5-point higher score than sunitinib (95% CI: 0.92–4.07; p < 0.002). The Supplementary Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQLQ) questionnaire also showed better results with pazopanib in 5 parameters [ 37 , 38 ]. Finally, in a post-hoc analysis, a trend towards a lower risk of experiencing a > 20% loss of QoL was observed with pazopanib compared to placebo [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%