2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Limiting the Operational Stability of Tin–Lead Perovskite Solar Cells

Abstract: Tin–lead perovskite solar cells (TLPSCs) have emerged as one of the most efficient photovoltaic technologies. However, their stability under operational conditions (ambient air, temperature, bias, and illumination) is lagging behind their sharp efficiency increase, restraining their further development. In this Focus Review, we provide insights into the degradation mechanisms of tin–lead perovskites and summarize the principal factors that currently limit the operational stability of TLPSCs. Specifically, pero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19,20] This particular bandgap range is appealing in solar cell applications because it can effectively harness the solar radiation spectrum to achieve the maximum theoretical efficiency limits of a singlejunction solar cell. [21] Additionally, the narrow-bandgap Sn-Pb perovskites can be paired with wide-bandgap perovskite to fabricate ultrahigh efficiency all-perovskite tandem solar cells. [22][23][24] Nevertheless, the device efficiency and stability of Sncontaining PSCs significantly lag behind their Pb-based counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20] This particular bandgap range is appealing in solar cell applications because it can effectively harness the solar radiation spectrum to achieve the maximum theoretical efficiency limits of a singlejunction solar cell. [21] Additionally, the narrow-bandgap Sn-Pb perovskites can be paired with wide-bandgap perovskite to fabricate ultrahigh efficiency all-perovskite tandem solar cells. [22][23][24] Nevertheless, the device efficiency and stability of Sncontaining PSCs significantly lag behind their Pb-based counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported, I − ion intercalation leads to numerous voids of C 60 ETL and causes irreversible degradation of the Ag electrode, seriously deteriorating the device performance. 10,40 In striking contrast, lower concentration and shallower penetration of the I − ion in the C 60 layer and Ag electrode were observed in aging target devices, suggesting the ameliorated I − ion migration during the aging process. Meanwhile, the target device exhibited enhanced resistance to Ag diffusion relative to the control device, benefiting the stability enhancement of devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental species, such as oxygen/water molecules, preferentially coordinate with the undercoordinated ions caused by fragile Sn−I frameworks to trigger Sn 2+ oxidation and phase transition. 10,11 A high-quality surface at the contact interface is crucial to achieving superior device performance. Considering the charge transport in the vertical direction of PSCs, the band misalignment and interfacial recombination that originate from surface imperfections predominantly limit the carrier 30% and excellent operational stability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 Identifying main surface vulnerabilities and implementing suitable modifications is crucial to minimize defects and ensure the stability of Sn−Pb perovskite solar cells (PSCs). 5,6 Various surface passivation approaches have been explored to enhance the performance and stability of Sn−Pb PSCs. 7,8 For instance, Li et al improved the moisture stability of the cells by introducing a quasi-two-dimensional (2D) heterostructure using 2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethylammonium iodide on the three-dimensional (3D) perovskite counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%