1995
DOI: 10.2331/fishsci.61.921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors of Catch Fluctuations of Skipjack Tuna in the North-eastern Waters of Japan and Its Forecasting

Abstract: In this paper, we attempt to develop a reasonable catch forecasting method for skipjack tuna caught in the northeastern waters of Japan. In developing such a method, it is very important to find the main factors which control the catch fluctuations. The conventional method is based on the data of mean length and mean fatness of the fish harvested just before the fishing season, and the reproductive relationship estimated using the catch history. This approach, however, failed to forecast the catch in the years… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goodness of fit and parsimony of the models were examined based on three values: (1) the significance level of the simple or multiple correlation coefficient r or R (F-tested for R), (2) the sum of squares (SS) for the difference between the observed and predicted CPUEs and (3) the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value, which provides a combined measure of statistical fit and model parsimony (Akaike, 1974). We also tested the extrapolation for forecasting using the method of Sakuramoto et al (1995). First, we estimated the parameters of regression models using data collected during 1989-1998 (n = 10) and forecasted the CPUE for 1999 using the independent variables for 1999.…”
Section: Environmental Indices Related To Cpue and Development Of Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of fit and parsimony of the models were examined based on three values: (1) the significance level of the simple or multiple correlation coefficient r or R (F-tested for R), (2) the sum of squares (SS) for the difference between the observed and predicted CPUEs and (3) the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value, which provides a combined measure of statistical fit and model parsimony (Akaike, 1974). We also tested the extrapolation for forecasting using the method of Sakuramoto et al (1995). First, we estimated the parameters of regression models using data collected during 1989-1998 (n = 10) and forecasted the CPUE for 1999 using the independent variables for 1999.…”
Section: Environmental Indices Related To Cpue and Development Of Formentioning
confidence: 99%