2012
DOI: 10.5610/jaee.12.2_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors of Variability and Measures for the Shakeability of Long-Period Ground Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant period of the observed LP waves in the Kanto Basin ranged from 3 to 10 s (e.g., Furumura & Hayakawa, 2007;Yoshimoto & Takemura, 2014), which is roughly proportional to the basement depth; however, the period also varies with the earthquake magnitude (i.e., the source spectrum) and the incident direction of the surface waves to the 3-D basin structure (e.g., Denolle et al, 2013;Furumura, 2014aFurumura, , 2014bYuzawa & Nagumo, 2012).…”
Section: Observed Lp Ground Motions Of the 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant period of the observed LP waves in the Kanto Basin ranged from 3 to 10 s (e.g., Furumura & Hayakawa, 2007;Yoshimoto & Takemura, 2014), which is roughly proportional to the basement depth; however, the period also varies with the earthquake magnitude (i.e., the source spectrum) and the incident direction of the surface waves to the 3-D basin structure (e.g., Denolle et al, 2013;Furumura, 2014aFurumura, , 2014bYuzawa & Nagumo, 2012).…”
Section: Observed Lp Ground Motions Of the 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation and propagation of significant later arrivals with a predominant period of 5 s during the 2011 event were not affected by the trenchlike structure of the Kanto Basin. Yuzawa and Nagumo (2012) studied the shakability of long-period ground motion in Kanto Basin and pointed out that its variability is due to source region. They interpreted the amplitude variation as due to the distance that the surface wave travels through sedimentary layers.…”
Section: Effects Of Source Region Velocity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both epicenters were located northwest of Tokyo Bay, and the distances from Tokyo Bay were comparable. Usually, ground motion characteristics are estimated based on source parameters, path distance, and site conditions (e.g., Kanno et al 2006;Yokota et al 2011;Yuzawa and Nagumo 2012). Considering this, although the ground motions observed in the Tokyo Bay area during these two events should have shown similar characteristics, their seismograms showed some differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the propagation and amplification of the LP ground motions in large basins are significantly influenced by the heterogeneous 3‐D subsurface structures along long propagation paths and cause strong focusing and defocusing (e.g., Denolle et al, 2013; Frankel et al, 2018; Furumura & Hayakawa, 2007; Mukai et al, 2018; Wirth et al, 2019). For example, the amplification of the LP ground motions in the Kanto basin was shown to have large variations with respect to the incident angle of the LP surface waves to the basin edge; the amplification was larger for the earthquakes occurring in the north to southwest of Tokyo, whereas it is much weaker for the earthquakes occurring in the northeast (e.g., Furumura, 2014; Uetake, 2017; Yuzawa & Nagumo, 2012). Also, the earthquakes occurring in the Nankai Trough are usually characterized by longer durations of LP ground motions after traversing the accretionary wedge of the Nankai Trough subduction zone (Furumura et al, 2008; Hayakawa et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%