2011
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181fecda9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Predictive of Visual Acuity Outcomes 1 Year After Photodynamic Therapy in Japanese Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Abstract: Photodynamic therapy stabilized eyes anatomically and functionally. Clinical characteristics at baseline were predictors of favorable VA outcomes after PDT. These findings may help establish the strategy of treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be taken into account that type 1 PCV had a larger GLD than type 2 PCV at baseline. Since previous reports demonstrated that smaller lesions were more susceptible to PDT [10,23,24], differences in the mean lesion size between type 1 PCV group and type 2 PCV group might influence in part the outcome of PDT in the present study. However, the good response to PDT in type 2 PCV remained significant after matching the lesion size with that of type 1 PCV, which confirmed the higher susceptibility of type 2 PCV to PDT compared to type 1 PCV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, it should be taken into account that type 1 PCV had a larger GLD than type 2 PCV at baseline. Since previous reports demonstrated that smaller lesions were more susceptible to PDT [10,23,24], differences in the mean lesion size between type 1 PCV group and type 2 PCV group might influence in part the outcome of PDT in the present study. However, the good response to PDT in type 2 PCV remained significant after matching the lesion size with that of type 1 PCV, which confirmed the higher susceptibility of type 2 PCV to PDT compared to type 1 PCV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…PDT combined with anti-VEGF therapy is currently recommended for treatment of PCV and was reported to have good visual outcome in patients suffering from PCV. [22][23][24][25] However, relatively few studies have investigated the visual prognostic factors following PCV treatments, [26][27][28][29][30] especially the predictive factors following combined therapy. Some of the clinical factors such as age, baseline best-corrected visual acuity and size of haemorrhage, and presence of PED were reported to govern the final visual outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the clinical factors such as age, baseline best-corrected visual acuity and size of haemorrhage, and presence of PED were reported to govern the final visual outcome. 26 Recently, the baseline polyp size and the location of polyps were also proven to affect the long-term visual acuity in a retrospective cohort. 31 However, these results were rather inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the angiographic subtypes of PCV, type 1 PCV is considered to be more refractory to PDT than type 2 PCV [60]. Although the mean VA was improved and maintained up to 12 months after PDT in most reports [14,15,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119], longer observational studies revealed that the merit of therapy was reduced 12 months after the initial PDT, mainly due to recurrences of the lesions [14,120,121,122]. Consequently, the improvement in the mean VA of the PCV patients was not significant anymore 30-36 months after the initial PDT [14,121,122].…”
Section: Response To Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%