Factors Regulating the Distribution and Population Dynamics of the Amphipod Gammarus palustris in an Intertidal Salt Marsh Community

Abstract

Seasonal changes in the intertidal distribution, abundance and population dynamics of the epifaunal amphipod Gammarus palustris were studied in salt marshes bordering 2 estuarine rivers flowing into the Chesapeake Bay. The amphipod populations inhabiting the Patuxent River study site showed abundance peaks during the spring and autumn, and major declines in density during the summer and winter. Populations at 2 study sites in the Rhode River showed only 1 peak of abundance during the late spring and early summer which was followed by a decline in density throughout the remainder of the year. In both rivers, the low amphipod densities observed during the winter corresponded with a subtidal migration. Migrations did not account for the low numbers observed at other times and an examination of the life cycle of this species as well as an egg—ratio analysis of the populations indicated that low densities during the summer (Patuxent) or late summer and fall (Rhode) were not due solely to life—cycle events. The tolerance of G. palustris to 3 environmental parameters was tested in the laboratory. These included low—salinity, heat/desiccation and freezing—stress experiments. Comparisons of the results with observed fluctuations of these variables at the study sites demonstrated that only freezing stress would probably cause significant mortality in intertidal populations of this species. Insufficient tolerance to this stress was postulated as the reason for the observed distributional shift to subtidal areas during the winter. Amphipod distribution within the intertidal zone at other times of the year was highly correlated with Spartina density. Substratum preference experiments indicated that this was due to a strong behavioral preference by this species for Spartina culms. Intraspecific and interspecific competition for food were tested by an analysis of 3 reproductive indices: the estimated birth rate as calculated by the egg—ratio method, the average brood size and the average brood size/ovigerous ♀. The former 2 indices declined during the early summer as a result of natural adult female mortality and a decreased proportion of ovigerous to nonovigerous ♀ ♀. The average brood size/ovigerous ♀ did not decline significantly throughout the reproductive period indicating that food limitation did not induce the observed summer decline in amphipod abundance. Intraspecific competition for space was tested in the laboratory by crowding and competitive—displacement experiments. The results indicated that competition for space was not directly responsible for the summer decrease in amphipod density but did influence amphipod distribution when Spartina culms were a limited resource. In this situation, G. palustris was capable of intraspecific displacement and evidence is presented which indicates that adults are able to displace juveniles from the preferred substratum. Interspecific competition was not examined experimentally because most of the associated fauna inhabiting the marsh beds were infaunal species. Laboratory predati...

Pipefish foraging: effects of fish size, prey size and altered habitat complexity

“…These amphipods are morphologically very similar, and like most free-living vegetation-dwelling amphipods, are highly thigmotactic (Nagle 1968, van Dolah 1978. Preliminary observations indicated that both preferred to occupy spaces between basal portions of grassblades, demonstrated comparable activities and movements, and interacted with pipefish in identical manners.…”

“…Two Gammarus spp, were used interchangeably as prey: G. mueronatus, an inhabitant of eelgrass and algal communities (Fredette & Diaz 1986), and G. palustris, an intertidal marsh inhabitant (van Dolah 1978). These amphipods are morphologically very similar, and like most free-living vegetation-dwelling amphipods, are highly thigmotactic (Nagle 1968, van Dolah 1978.…”

“…In the absence of some spatial or temporal heterogeneity, predator-prey systems may be unstable, as exemplified by simple laboratory systems where both prey and predator go extinct (Gause 1934). Numerous physical aspects of aquatic habitats provide structural complexity: substrate (Lipcius & Hines 1986, Smith & Coull 1987, litter (Ware 1972), worm-tubes (Bell & Coen 1982), emergent macrophytes (van Dolah 1978), and submerged macrophytes (Crowder & Cooper 1982, Stoner 1982, Coull & Wells 1983. The effect of artificial structure upon predator-prey interaction has also been examined (Heck & Thoman 1981, Marinelli & Coull 1987, Russo 1987.…”

Trophic overlap between cohabiting populations of invasive mosquitofish and an endangered toothcarp at changing salinity conditions

“…Since Gammarus individuals compete for the refuge that substratum provides, their average size is usually higher in the benthos than in the water column (Van Dolah 1978, Newman & Waters 1984, Morillo-Velarde et al 2011. On the assumption that this pattern is similar in G. aequicauda, the increase of the G. aequicauda biomass consumed by the toothcarp and the diminution of such consumption in the mosquitofish could reflect a shift in feeding strategy with reduced salinity.…”

Polygenic control of habitat preference and its possible role in sympatric population subdivision in an estuarine crustacean

“…Estuarine epibenthic amphipods are typically found on a wide range of substrates (Levings eta!., 1975;Van Dolah, 1978;Borowsky et a!., 1985). Eogammarus confervicolus is no exception and throughout brackish waters of the north-east Pacific, can routinely be found under various species of algae, marsh plants, wood debris and rocks (Pomeroy & Levings, 1980;Stanhope & Levings, 1985).…”