Objective: This study aims to assess the short- and long-term changes in the upper airway and facial soft tissue after mini-implant -assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in nongrowing patients with maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD).
Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched up to 10 March 2023 without limitations and included studies were identified in accordance with the PICOS principles. The main outcomes were classified into three groups: 1) nasal cavity changes, 2) upper airway volume changes and 3) alar changes. Six reviewers independently completed literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess changes in the main outcomes. Heterogeneity tests, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were also analysed.
Result: Overall, 2158 articles were retrieved; 18 articles met the inclusion criteria, and 16 articles were included for data analysis. Nasal cavity width (WMD: 1.58 mm; 95% CI: 0.90, 2.26) and nasal floor width (WMD: 1.88 mm; 95% CI: 0.75, 3.02) increased significantly. While palatopharyngeal volume (WMD: 0.2 cm3, 95% CI: -0.61, 1.00), glossopharyngeal volume (WMD: -0.35 cm3, 95% CI: -1.88, 1.18) and hypopharyngeal volume (WMD: -0.90 cm3; 95% CI: -1.86, 0.06) remained unchanged, nasal cavity volume (WMD: 1.24 cm3, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.81), nasopharyngeal volume (MD: 0.75 cm3, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.06), oropharyngeal volume (WMD: 0.59 cm3, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.92), and total volume of the upper airway (WMD: 1.67 cm3, 95% CI: 0.68, 2.66) increased significantly (P<0.05). Alar width (WMD: 1.47 mm; 95% CI: 0.40, 2.55) and alar base width (WMD: 2.02 mm; 95% CI: 0.26, 3.77) also increased in the short term.
Conclusion: MARPE can increase nasal cavity width, nasal cavity volume, nasopharyngeal volume and oropharyngeal volume for nongrowing patients, but has no significant effect on hypopharyngeal volume. In addition, the alar width also increased. However, the studies included in this meta-analysis were mainly retrospective, nonrandomized and small in number, so the findings should be interpreted with caution and high-quality RCTs need to be studied.