2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1431-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors related to use of the Internet as a source of health information by urological cancer patients

Abstract: The study outlines the profile of urological cancer patients who use the Internet as a source of health information. Internet use is related to a patient's attitude towards decision making, level of education and whether or not they look for information from sources other than the health system itself.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two possible confounders are level of education and computer literacy. Both variables, education and computer literacy, have been shown to significantly influence Internet access; but not one's effectiveness in using, or taking advantage of, information obtained through Internet access (Thomas & Rutter, 2008;Valero-Aguilera et al, 2012). Since Internet access is not a criterion in the path model, the exclusion of level of education and computer literacy arguably does not invalidate our findings, as Internet access is captured through the variable Internet diffusion.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Two possible confounders are level of education and computer literacy. Both variables, education and computer literacy, have been shown to significantly influence Internet access; but not one's effectiveness in using, or taking advantage of, information obtained through Internet access (Thomas & Rutter, 2008;Valero-Aguilera et al, 2012). Since Internet access is not a criterion in the path model, the exclusion of level of education and computer literacy arguably does not invalidate our findings, as Internet access is captured through the variable Internet diffusion.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…DELICIOUS linking is inherently subjective ("I liked this site") and does not in any way measure quality of information because some homeopathy sites are highly linked, for example. Although Alexa, Google PageRank, and DELICIOUS may have met our very loose definition of technical quality criteria, our previous work 26 shows that popularity and quality as represented by domainindependent technical quality criteria are not related. Therefore, we do not consider Alexa to be a quality assessment tool that can benefit consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This in itself illustrates the limited usefulness of Google PageRank and DELICIOUS as a means of classifying Web sites based on their impact or quality, as already discussed by other authors. 26, 33 The results of Table 4 are inherently unreliable, as page rankings are well known to be easily manipulated by Web masters and advertisers. DELICIOUS linking is inherently subjective ("I liked this site") and does not in any way measure quality of information because some homeopathy sites are highly linked, for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is an abundance of literature on the topics of education, IT, and Internet information seeking in health care [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], up-to-date literature comparing computer-based learning systems (CBLSs) with standard education in cancer populations is scarce. Although several systematic reviews compare CBLSs with standard education [1,[29][30][31][32][33], these reviews include studies dating from 1983 [30].…”
Section: Patient Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%