2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12914-018-0161-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors shaping political priorities for violence against women-mitigation policies in Sri Lanka

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough violence against women (VAW) is a global public health issue, its importance as a health issue is often unrecognized in legal and health policy documents. This paper uses Sri Lanka as a case study to explore the factors influencing the national policy response to VAW, particularly by the health sector.MethodsA document based health policy analysis was conducted to examine current policy responses to VAW in Sri Lanka using the Shiffman and Smith (2007) policy analysis framework.ResultsThe fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of the current DVPC Law illustrates the failure of the draft policy committee in convincing and lobbying members of National Assembly to adopt the standard UN definitions on violence against women. International development partners and non-government organizations had advocated for gender equality and women’s rights, and pushed for a legal agenda that framed the law as violence against women, as is done in many other countries [34, 35]. These actors were unable to succeed in changing the attitudes of members of the National Assembly, and thus the definitions of DV acts and consequences remain quite restrictive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of the current DVPC Law illustrates the failure of the draft policy committee in convincing and lobbying members of National Assembly to adopt the standard UN definitions on violence against women. International development partners and non-government organizations had advocated for gender equality and women’s rights, and pushed for a legal agenda that framed the law as violence against women, as is done in many other countries [34, 35]. These actors were unable to succeed in changing the attitudes of members of the National Assembly, and thus the definitions of DV acts and consequences remain quite restrictive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reinforces the integrated and standardised care provision by ensuring advocacy, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of these instruments [39][40][41].…”
Section: Relevance Of Guidelines and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This has also been described in some studies, where government changes have increased the political will to address DV from the top down to the care provider level. This reinforces the integrated and standardised care provision by ensuring advocacy, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of these instruments [47][48][49].…”
Section: Relevance Of Guidelines and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 84%