2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that affect the allergic rhinitis response to ragweed allergen exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
30
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of our studied participants were either Hispanic white subjects or nonHispanic white subjects, and we found that race, age, sex, or skin test results to ragweed did not associate with symptom scores, whereas the symptom scores elicited in the PCC were strong determinants of the level of symptoms experienced during the natural season. Consistent with previous studies, [11][12][13][14] our study confirmed that the rate of symptom development or maximal symptom level achieved by participants exposed to ragweed pollen in the PCC or natural season was unrelated to the size of their ragweed skin test response. Together, these results substantiate Correlations were derived based on the maximum score recorded in each subject (n 5 26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Most of our studied participants were either Hispanic white subjects or nonHispanic white subjects, and we found that race, age, sex, or skin test results to ragweed did not associate with symptom scores, whereas the symptom scores elicited in the PCC were strong determinants of the level of symptoms experienced during the natural season. Consistent with previous studies, [11][12][13][14] our study confirmed that the rate of symptom development or maximal symptom level achieved by participants exposed to ragweed pollen in the PCC or natural season was unrelated to the size of their ragweed skin test response. Together, these results substantiate Correlations were derived based on the maximum score recorded in each subject (n 5 26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The symptom scores generated from the group exposed to 3500 grains/m 3 of grass pollen generally mirrored the responses seen previously with our ragweed pollen exposures, with some individuals reacting quickly with high symptom scores and others to a lesser degree [8]. The overall degree of symptomatic responses was also similar to those seen in ragweed sensitive subjects in a study conducted to evaluate the presence or absence of late phase allergic rhinitis responses to ragweed challenge in the EEU [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The overall degree of symptomatic responses was also similar to those seen in ragweed sensitive subjects in a study conducted to evaluate the presence or absence of late phase allergic rhinitis responses to ragweed challenge in the EEU [19]. In both of these studies, the mean TNSS at hour 3 was 8.6 to 9.2 with standard deviations of 2.0-2.1, respectively (8,19, data on file). The predictability of more rapid allergic symptoms achieved on the second day of pollen exposure may help to control for this variability, though no meaningful change in standard deviations between Day 1 and Day 2 data in the high or low concentration groups was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 The effects of priming can be nonspecific. 25,27 For example, if a cat allergic participant is exposed to a cat before study entry (ie, already primed), the level of allergen required to activate their symptoms during a noncat allergen study would be lower than that required for a nonprimed person. Although studies that followed found similar effects, some reported the lack of the priming phenomenon, which may be attributed to the method of allergen introduction, evaluation of the response, or seasonal effects.…”
Section: Duration Of Allergen Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%