The IRM is designed to provide a disciplined and flexible framework for the study the social-perceptual phenomena of self-enhancement, intergroup accentuation, ingroup-favoritism, and differential accuracy of group perception, and the associations among these phenomena. The commentaries on the target article individually and collectively point to opportunities to further develop the model and to situate it in the context of contemporary theory and research in social and cognitive psychology. There are, of course, also critical and skeptical comments, which we address in this rejoinder. We organize our arguments by considering four themes of discussion: the model’s coherence, falsifiability, sufficiency, and timeliness. We close by suggesting that the IRM, beyond its proper domain of applicability represents a way of thinking about social perception characterized by parsimonious assumptions and precise predictions.