2019
DOI: 10.1504/jgba.2019.101390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that drive development of technological entrepreneurship in South Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of GST in India is a process innovation of continuous nature, depending heavily upon the principles of appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability (Fannin, 2016). Also, Singh and Dhir (2021) pointed that studies addressing innovation implementation focused on specific organizational contexts, including manufacturing (Dwivedi et al, 2019;Jamwal et al, 2019), Entrepreneurship (Parameswar et al, 2019;Singh et al, 2019), health (Birken et al, 2015;Pradhan et al, 2019), transportation (Shankar et al, 2019), financial inclusion (Malik et al, 2019), and ERP implementation (Nagpal et al, 2019). However, studies cited in the public policy domain were scanty (Singla & Hooda, 2018;Sushil, 2008;Sushil, 2019, Suri & Sushil, 2012Suri & Sushil, 2008).…”
Section: Literature On Innovation Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of GST in India is a process innovation of continuous nature, depending heavily upon the principles of appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability (Fannin, 2016). Also, Singh and Dhir (2021) pointed that studies addressing innovation implementation focused on specific organizational contexts, including manufacturing (Dwivedi et al, 2019;Jamwal et al, 2019), Entrepreneurship (Parameswar et al, 2019;Singh et al, 2019), health (Birken et al, 2015;Pradhan et al, 2019), transportation (Shankar et al, 2019), financial inclusion (Malik et al, 2019), and ERP implementation (Nagpal et al, 2019). However, studies cited in the public policy domain were scanty (Singla & Hooda, 2018;Sushil, 2008;Sushil, 2019, Suri & Sushil, 2012Suri & Sushil, 2008).…”
Section: Literature On Innovation Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the relationship once detected as bidirectional may end-up as unidirectional in nature. TISM differs from the ISM model in that it may retain certain significant transitive links with some meaningful interpretation and value addition (Parameswar et al , 2019). Currently, the researchers are even trying TISM with FMICMAC analysis to strengthen their findings (Jain and Raj, 2015).…”
Section: Extension Of Ism As a Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, later advancements of ISM approach i.e. fuzzy ISM, total ISM and modified total ISM address these aspects (Parameswar et al , 2019). The researchers have been using these approaches for long to explore and examine the issues of interests across the disciplines, namely, operations management, marketing and communications, logistics and supply chain management etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological acquisitions may lead to greater value creation, organizational innovation (Puranam, Singh, & Zollo, 2006), and successive performance of its affiliated organizations in cross‐border deals (Ahuja & Katila, 2001). The performance after M&A is often seen as a symbol of synergy benefits (Collins, Holcomb, Certo, Hitt, & Lester, 2009; Harrison et al, 1991) that involve technology innovation, value creation, and product development (Agarwal, Jain, Sinha, & Dhir, 2020; Parameswar, Hasan, Dhir, & Ongsakul, 2019). The main expectation of any acquisition is to gain a new market, gain a customer base (Mandal, Love, & Irani, 2003), develop skills, and innovative performance (Crook, Ketchen Jr, Combs, & Todd, 2008).…”
Section: Related Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%