2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32057-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors That Influence Length of Stay for In-Patient Gynaecology Surgery: Is The Case Mix Group (CMG) or Type of Procedure More Important?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to studies of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty 16,24 , female sex was a risk factor for a longer length of stay. Our data also demonstrated that ASA grades were associated with a longer length of stay 25,26 , where patients classified as ASA grade 1 had a significantly shorter length of stay compared with those classified as ASA grades 2 and 3.…”
Section: Predictive Model and Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Similar to studies of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty 16,24 , female sex was a risk factor for a longer length of stay. Our data also demonstrated that ASA grades were associated with a longer length of stay 25,26 , where patients classified as ASA grade 1 had a significantly shorter length of stay compared with those classified as ASA grades 2 and 3.…”
Section: Predictive Model and Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…[5–9] Moreover, the predictive impact of the ASA classification was studied in a prospective study with 295 consecutive total abdominal hysterectomy patients and it was reported that ASA scores are correlated with total blood loss during surgery. [10] In particular, ASA score III is a predictor of greater blood loss, and therefore transfusion units required as compared to lower ASA class patients.…”
Section: Correlation With Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown correlations between the ASA-PS in postoperative outcomes such as infection, anastomotic failure, pulmonary complications, length of stay, and mortality. In a range of surgical cohorts including orthopedic, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and thoracic, [49][50][51][52][53][54][55] the ASA score is simple and can be performed rapidly at the bedside, but it carries significant inter-rater variation and is therefore thought to lack discriminatory power 56 compared with more complex but informative risk scores. 57…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%