2009
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors That Influence Measurements and Accurate Evaluation of Stent Apposition by Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment Using a Phantom Model

Abstract: Background: Factors influencing measurements and accurate evaluation of stent apposition by optical coherence tomography (OCT) are not established. Methods and Results: Phantom models of known luminal sizes and lengths were evaluated by OCT under various conditions and measurements were compared with actual values. Stents implanted into phantom models were examined by OCT to validate the measurement point on the stent strut surface for accurate evaluation of stent apposition. Strut thickness was measured at 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hereto, measurements are performed in Cartesian (scan converted) images with a resolution of 1,024 9 1,024 pixels. Distances are analyzed as follows: the central point of every strut is identified [11] and from that point, the distance perpendicular to the lumen is computed. If more than one direction is perpendicular to the vessel boundary (in case of high curvature), the minimal distance is taken into account.…”
Section: Scan Conversion and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hereto, measurements are performed in Cartesian (scan converted) images with a resolution of 1,024 9 1,024 pixels. Distances are analyzed as follows: the central point of every strut is identified [11] and from that point, the distance perpendicular to the lumen is computed. If more than one direction is perpendicular to the vessel boundary (in case of high curvature), the minimal distance is taken into account.…”
Section: Scan Conversion and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the TD-OCT image wire is often positioned eccentrically, especially in curved vessel segments, even though centering of the image wire over the entire length of the target segments is very important for obtaining more reliable cross-sectional images. This eccentric position of the image wire may have affected the quantitative analysis by TD-OCT. 30 Frequency-domain OCT (FD-OCT) has been developed to overcome many of the technical limitations of the current TD-OCT system, including higher frame rates (100 frame/s), a wider scan diameter (10 mm), and a faster image acquisition rate (20 mm/s) without the loss of image quality. It can be delivered as a rapid exchange catheter over a conventional coronary guidewire.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 To evaluate the radial unevenness of NIT (RUNIT), the difference between the maximum and minimum NIT was calculated for each cross-section and to evaluate the longitudinal axis unevenness of NIT (LUNIT), the difference between the maximum NIT and minimum NIT in the longitudinal axis was calculated for each stent. In addition, frequency of thrombus formation and low-density spots surrounding the strut were recorded.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pes With Ses By Octmentioning
confidence: 99%