2021
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2021.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that Influence the Selection of a Data Science Process Management Methodology: An Exploratory Study

Abstract: This paper explores the factors that impact the adoption of a process methodology for managing and coordinating data science projects. Specifically, by conducting semi-structured interviews from data scientists and managers across 14 organizations, eight factors were identified that influence the adoption of a data science project management methodology. Two were technical factors (Exploratory Data Analysis, Data Collection and Cleaning). Three were organizational factors (Receptiveness to Methodology, Team Si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process adoption papers discussed the key factors as well as the challenges for a data science team to adopt a new process. Specifically, the papers that discussed process adoption considered questions such as acceptance factors ( Saltz, 2017 , 2018 ; Saltz & Hotz, 2021 ), project success factors ( Soukaina et al, 2019 ), exploring the application of software engineering practices in the data science context ( Saltz & Shamshurin, 2017 ), and would deep learning impact a data science teams process adoption ( Shamshurin & Saltz, 2019a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process adoption papers discussed the key factors as well as the challenges for a data science team to adopt a new process. Specifically, the papers that discussed process adoption considered questions such as acceptance factors ( Saltz, 2017 , 2018 ; Saltz & Hotz, 2021 ), project success factors ( Soukaina et al, 2019 ), exploring the application of software engineering practices in the data science context ( Saltz & Shamshurin, 2017 ), and would deep learning impact a data science teams process adoption ( Shamshurin & Saltz, 2019a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering a survey from KDnuggets in 2014 [10], the main methodology used by 43% of responders was CRISP-DM. This methodology has been consistently the most commonly used for analytics, data mining and data science projects, for each KDnuggets poll starting in 2002 up through the most recent 2014 poll [11]. Despite its popularity, CRISP-DM was created back in the mid-1990 and has not been revised since its creation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%