Factors that may affect the success of scent detection dogs: Exploring non-conventional models of preparation and deployment

Abstract

In the target article titled "Behavioral and Cognitive Factors That Affect the Success of Scent Detection Dogs," Troisi and colleagues highlight several challenges associated with scent detection dog preparation and deployment. Traditionally, scent detection dogs have been bred, raised, and trained at designated training facilities. More recently, several organizations, primarily in the conservation detection industry, have employed nonconventional models of scent detection dog selection and preparation. In this commentary, we highlight three of these nonconventional models: the community-based model, in which community members and their privately owned dogs are trained for deployment; the community-fostered model, in which puppies live with foster families during training; and the shelter-based model, in which dogs are sourced from shelters and rescues. We generally discuss these approaches and emphasize various benefits for both the dogs and the organizations. Finally, we explore the possibility that different models of scent detection selection, preparation, and deployment may support scientific opportunities for a better understanding of the ideal qualities of a detection dog-handler team.

Detection dogs in nature conservation: A database on their world‐wide deployment with a review on breeds used and their performance compared to other methods

“…Although selection of the most appropriate WDD is important, training, target density and suitability, and study design appeared to have a greater impact. Moreover, in addition to the dogs' age and experience, their biological, psychological and social characteristics (Beebe et al., 2016) as well as their handling and housing are likely to play a role in their performance (Byosiere et al., 2019). Finally, other reasons for the dogs' performances were excessive costs (nine cases) and target verification issues (three cases; Table 4).…”

Benefits of overwintering in the conservation breeding and translocation of a critically endangered amphibian

“…Recently radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology has significantly increased recapture rates of this species in the wild(Hammond et al 2020), opening doors for an improved understanding of which prerelease treatments may enhance postrelease success. Small radio‐telemetry implants and scent detection dogs (Savidge et al 2011; Byosiere, et al, 2019) are also being tested for their ability to increase detection of this species. Statistical methods to account for uncertainty may also be implemented in the future (e.g., [Gilroy et al 2012; Schaub and Royle 2014]).…”

Diving in Nose First: The Influence of Unfamiliar Search Scale and Environmental Context on the Search Performance of Volunteer Conservation Detection Dog–Handler Teams

“…Models of procuring, training and utilizing CDDs are varied [ 10 , 11 , 12 ] and poorly documented. However, we are aware that procuring and training working dogs, while also meeting their housing, nutrition, veterinary and welfare requirements, imposes considerable time and financial costs.…”

“…Development of a model for training and deploying skilled volunteers and their pet dogs in some CDD roles could help address these financial and welfare issues. Participants in a volunteer-based model would be responsible for their dog’s care, nutrition and veterinary costs, and provide an enriching home environment throughout and beyond the dog’s working life [ 11 ].…”