Faculty development and the future of college teaching

Abstract

The faculty development movement of the 1970s and 1980s now turns its attention to the recruitment and preparation of the next generation of college teachers.

LPSA: Online educational video evaluation considering cognitive and teaching style

“…For example, Grigorenko and Steinberg divide teaching styles into legislative, executive, critical, holistic, partial, radical, and conservative styles [10]. Lacey et al [19] divide teaching styles into sensitive and inclusive. From the perspective of teaching attitude, Kapadia [18] divides teaching styles into concrete, abstract, recessive, visible, direct, indirect, positive, negative, continuous, and holistic.…”

A Multi-Institutional Study of Teaching Development Opportunities and Faculty Practice

“…Faculty development encompasses a wide array of activities and practices which seek to help faculty improve in any aspect of their professional academic careers, including, but not limited to, their teaching and research, though Lacey's (1988) review of the then-burgeoning faculty development movement makes clear that teaching was an important early focus of such efforts, such as those studied in Centra's (1976) foundational study of faculty development practices. Teaching development practices are often formally organized in nature, with faculty developers often ensuring that faculty continue to develop their capacity in teaching, assessment, and administration (Bilal, Guaraya, & Chen, 2017).…”