1999
DOI: 10.1177/009155219902700304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty Development in a National Sample of Community Colleges

Abstract: The author defines the activities that distinguish successful development programs and describes a survey administered in 1998 to faculty development officers at 250 randomly selected community colleges. Based on responses from 130 colleges, the author profiles those responsible for faculty development, summarizes the extent that each development activity is used, and articulates the need for concerted faculty development efforts at community colleges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The format provided an opportunity for dialogue versus mere question and answer (Holstein and Gubrium, 1995;Ray, 1994). Data were analyzed using a framework for faculty socialization that focused on graduate programming socialization (Austin, 2001), sources of stress for new faculty (Sorcinelli, 2002), and challenges facing community college faculty (Eddy, 2005(Eddy, , 2007Murray, 1999). Key fi ndings from this research include a lack of intentional planning for a career as a community college faculty member, connections to the regional university, and links to practice.…”
Section: Socialization and Faculty Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The format provided an opportunity for dialogue versus mere question and answer (Holstein and Gubrium, 1995;Ray, 1994). Data were analyzed using a framework for faculty socialization that focused on graduate programming socialization (Austin, 2001), sources of stress for new faculty (Sorcinelli, 2002), and challenges facing community college faculty (Eddy, 2005(Eddy, , 2007Murray, 1999). Key fi ndings from this research include a lack of intentional planning for a career as a community college faculty member, connections to the regional university, and links to practice.…”
Section: Socialization and Faculty Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…John Murray (1999a), the most frequently published author on the topic of professional development in community colleges, suggests that effective faculty development programs have several components: institutional support-a climate that encourages faculty development; a formal, goal-directed program; links between development and rewards; faculty ownership; support from colleagues for investments in teaching; and a belief on the part of instructors that administrators support and value good teaching. Similarly, Burnstad (1994) identifies several characteristics of effective faculty development programs: "comprehensive, supported by administration, managed by a staff developer, constituent driven, adequately funded, evaluated periodically, and supportive of the organization's mission" (pp.…”
Section: Components Of Professional Development Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that some of these components, such as a goal-directed program, are characteristics of an effective program, while the remainder consist of institutional conditions that contribute to the success of the intentional, goal-directed program. Successful programs need both content and institutional support, but separating the factors identified by Murray (1999a) and Burnstad (1994) into the two categories helps draw attention to the necessary institutional support factors.…”
Section: Components Of Professional Development Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 13) This call for a re-emphasis on teaching as the primary function of colleges in the new millennium has, unfortunately, not been fully heeded by college administrators. Murray (1999), in Faculty Development in a National Sample of Community Colleges, points out the urgent need for more serious attention to faculty development programs. Citing Schuster et al, Murray (1999) writes that colleges:…”
Section: Toward a Comprehensive Program Of Faculty Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murray (1999), in Faculty Development in a National Sample of Community Colleges, points out the urgent need for more serious attention to faculty development programs. Citing Schuster et al, Murray (1999) writes that colleges:…”
Section: Toward a Comprehensive Program Of Faculty Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%