2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icl.2015.7318070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty development programme based on CDIO framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main motives for choosing to adapt CDIO are ambitions to make engineering education more authentic, the need for a systematic methodology for educational design, and the desire to include more design and innovation in curricula. Chuchalin et al (2015) proposed a model to apply the CDIO framework for designing and implementation of faculty development program toward setting of skills of managers and faculty staff for efficient and consistent modernization of engineering programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main motives for choosing to adapt CDIO are ambitions to make engineering education more authentic, the need for a systematic methodology for educational design, and the desire to include more design and innovation in curricula. Chuchalin et al (2015) proposed a model to apply the CDIO framework for designing and implementation of faculty development program toward setting of skills of managers and faculty staff for efficient and consistent modernization of engineering programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a training program must always aim at the quality to serve the labor market needs, so there must be changes by the requirements and demands of the era as well as meeting the learners' wishes [32]. Wanting to change a program framework is not an easy thing; it needs to focus on factors such as mechanisms, social needs, and human resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many universities around the world use the CDIO approach (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) to update their Bachelor's (BEng) programs to prepare graduates to more complex engineering activities at all stages of the life cycle of technical objects, processes and systems [5]. This approach is widely used, as it is consistent with the requirements of international standards (IAE Graduate Attributes and Professional Competences) to the engineering HEI's graduate learning outcomes and competences of professional engineers (www.ieagreements.org/IEA-Grad-Attr-ProfCompetencies.pdf).…”
Section: Peking Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is widely used, as it is consistent with the requirements of international standards (IAE Graduate Attributes and Professional Competences) to the engineering HEI's graduate learning outcomes and competences of professional engineers (www.ieagreements.org/IEA-Grad-Attr-ProfCompetencies.pdf). The CDIO approach allows the design and implementation of BEng programs as a 06003-p. 3 basic engineering education in accordance with the criteria for accreditation of engineering programs in the countries -signatories of the Washington Accord, including the accreditation criteria of the Association for Engineering Education of Russia (AEER) [6]. In some Universities "CDIO concept was regarded as a new model for engineering education whose aims were to develop students' ability of engineering application to solve their employment problems efficiently" [7].…”
Section: Peking Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%