2005
DOI: 10.1177/0022487104274119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty First

Abstract: The increasing number of English language learners (ELLs) in U.S. schools requires rethinking teacher education (TE). Most teachers have received little preparation in how to educate ELLs.Change in TE programs is needed to ensure that TE students are prepared to teach ELLs. Such change begins by educating TE faculty first. One catalyst for change, a faculty institute in which faculty, doctoral students, and public school personnel participated, is described here. Analysis of the process, the content, and cours… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structured and explicitly scaffolded opportunities have shown to enhance preservice teachers' beliefs and attitudes toward EAL students (Coates, 2016;Daniel, 2014;Pettit, 2011) and to facilitate theory to practice connections (Ariza, 2003;Salerno & Kibler, 2013). Other studies contest that, without program-wide 'infusion' of English language learner -specific knowledge and skills, it is unlikely that preservice candidates will be prepared to engage in practices that ref lect a specific understanding of EAL students and their needs (Costa, McPhail, Smith, & Brisk, 2005;Levine & Howard, 2014;Nutta, Mokhtari, & Strebel, 2012). Moreover, without attention to the preparation of general education teacher educators, opportunities to meaningfully include more specialized knowledge and skills related to EAL teaching and learning into their course work are likely to be greatly diminished (de Jong, Naranjo, Li, & Ouzia, 2018;Faltis & Valdés, 2016).…”
Section: Preparing Teachers To Work With Eal Students: a North Americmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structured and explicitly scaffolded opportunities have shown to enhance preservice teachers' beliefs and attitudes toward EAL students (Coates, 2016;Daniel, 2014;Pettit, 2011) and to facilitate theory to practice connections (Ariza, 2003;Salerno & Kibler, 2013). Other studies contest that, without program-wide 'infusion' of English language learner -specific knowledge and skills, it is unlikely that preservice candidates will be prepared to engage in practices that ref lect a specific understanding of EAL students and their needs (Costa, McPhail, Smith, & Brisk, 2005;Levine & Howard, 2014;Nutta, Mokhtari, & Strebel, 2012). Moreover, without attention to the preparation of general education teacher educators, opportunities to meaningfully include more specialized knowledge and skills related to EAL teaching and learning into their course work are likely to be greatly diminished (de Jong, Naranjo, Li, & Ouzia, 2018;Faltis & Valdés, 2016).…”
Section: Preparing Teachers To Work With Eal Students: a North Americmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They fully satisfied requirements of two courses intended to prepare history teachers to work with BLs in which they practiced analyzing language demands of history and writing language objectives. Such coursework was developed in a program with a longstanding commitment to equipping teachers (and teacher educators) with knowledge and skills to work with BLs (Costa, McPhail, Smith, & Brisk, 2005;Schall-Leckrone & McQuillan, 2014). Given these factors, why did history teachers, who voluntarily participated in this study and were familiar with its objectives, neglect to identify and teach the language demands of history texts and tasks?…”
Section: How Novice Teachers Taught Language Demands Of Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in the past 10 years the Department of Public Instruction of North Carolina has devoted considerable human and financial resources for in-service training in response to its growing numbers of English learners (for a summary of recent efforts, see Lachance & Marino, 2012), Costa, McPhail, Smith, and Brisk (2005) have, nevertheless, indicated how relatively few teachers are prepared to work with English learners through teacher education programs. In addition, most teachers do not receive such opportunities to learn later in their careers.…”
Section: Beyond "Commodified Knowledge"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional and important perspective is the role of university educators in the process of preparing teachers to work with English learners. Varghese and Jenkins (2005) note the marginalization of ESL education in U.S. discussions about the professionalization of teaching and support the idea of including ESL content in teacher preparation, and Costa et al (2005) explain that "the responsibility lies with the faculty first, rather than with the students" (pp. 116-117), an argument that resonates with O'Hara and Pritchard's (2008) call for teacher educator professional development.…”
Section: Taking Professional Development Personallymentioning
confidence: 99%