2007
DOI: 10.1364/ao.46.003780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fade statistics and aperture averaging for Gaussian beam waves in moderate-to-strong turbulence

Abstract: The performance of lasercom systems operating in the atmosphere is reduced by optical turbulence, which causes irradiance fluctuations in the received signal. The result is a randomly fading signal. Fade statistics obtained from experimental data were compared to theoretical predictions based on the lognormal and gamma-gamma distributions. The probability of fade, the expected number of fades per second, and the mean fade time were calculated from the irradiance fluctuations of a Gaussian beam wave propagating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies support the fact that the LN model is valid in weak turbulence regime for a point receiver and works well in all regimes of turbulence for aperture averaged data [7,8]. On the other hand, the GG model is accepted to be valid in all turbulence regimes for a point receiver, nevertheless, this does not hold when aperture averaging takes place [2,7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental studies support the fact that the LN model is valid in weak turbulence regime for a point receiver and works well in all regimes of turbulence for aperture averaged data [7,8]. On the other hand, the GG model is accepted to be valid in all turbulence regimes for a point receiver, nevertheless, this does not hold when aperture averaging takes place [2,7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, the GG model is accepted to be valid in all turbulence regimes for a point receiver, nevertheless, this does not hold when aperture averaging takes place [2,7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experimental studies support the fact that the LN model is valid in weak turbulence regime for a point receiver and in all regimes of turbulence for aperture averaged data (Perlot & Fritzsche, 2004;Vetelino et al, 2007). On the other hand, the GG model is accepted to be valid in all turbulence regimes for a point receiver, nevertheless, this does not hold when aperture averaging takes place Vetelino et al, 2007).…”
Section: Probability Density Functions For the Received Optical Powermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most widely accepted distributions are the Log-Normal (LN) and the Gamma-Gamma (GG) models, although, many others have been subject of studies, namely, the K, Gamma, exponential, I-K and Lognormal-Rician distributions (Churnside & Frehlich, 1989;Epple, 2010;Vetelino et al, 2007).…”
Section: Probability Density Functions For the Received Optical Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning here, that the ergodic capacity is a very significant metric for the study of the wireless optical communication links, due to the strong influence of the atmospheric conditions in their performance, see e.g. (Andrews et al, 1999;Gappmair et al, 2010;Garcia-Zambrana, Castillo-Vasquez & Castillo-Vasquez, 2010;Garcia-Zambrana, Castillo-Vazquez & Castillo-Vazquez, 2010;Li & Uysal, 2003;Liu et al, 2010;Peppas & Datsikas, 2010;Popoola et al, 2008;Sandalidis & Tsiftsis, 2008;Tsiftsis, 2008;Vetelino et al, 2007;Zhu & Kahn, 2002). More specifically, the fast changes of the atmospheric turbulence conditions fades fast the transmitted signal and as a result, the estimation of the instantaneous channel capacity is nearly meaningless in this area of wireless communications.…”
Section: Optimal Rate Adaptation With Constant Transmit Powermentioning
confidence: 99%