2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) compared with other techniques for estimating the in vivo digestibility and dry matter intake of lactating grazing dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Coates (1998) found that the SEcv for DM intake and digestible DM intake, per unit BW, depended on the crossvalidation procedure and was therefore not robust. Only one study, conducted with very homogeneous groups of confined ewes fed complete mixed diets (Decandia et al, 2007), obtained R 2 cv > 0.8, and Decruyenaere et al (2012) succeeded in developing an intake model for a very homogeneous grass sward in Belgium that used FNIRS, grass growth measurements and milk yield. Such a model is not relevant to beef cattle grazing highly heterogeneous rangelands of the east Mediterranean region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coates (1998) found that the SEcv for DM intake and digestible DM intake, per unit BW, depended on the crossvalidation procedure and was therefore not robust. Only one study, conducted with very homogeneous groups of confined ewes fed complete mixed diets (Decandia et al, 2007), obtained R 2 cv > 0.8, and Decruyenaere et al (2012) succeeded in developing an intake model for a very homogeneous grass sward in Belgium that used FNIRS, grass growth measurements and milk yield. Such a model is not relevant to beef cattle grazing highly heterogeneous rangelands of the east Mediterranean region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in developing calibration equations is to collect a reference database that is as representative as possible for a given field data diversity. Thus, better calibration statistics are often obtained by increasing the size of reference data (Decruyenaere et al 2012). Williams (2004 concluded that the coefficient of determination should be higher than 0.8 and the standard error of cross-validation should be close to the standard error of calibration to ensure adequate reliability of the predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Een opkomende methodiek is het bepalen van grasopname door een NIRS analyse uit te voeren op melk-of mestmonsters (Decruyenaere et al, 2012). • Inzicht krijgen in de hoeveelheid bijvoeding voor de weideperiode om vervolgens groepen te maken met bijvoedingsniveau en zo in te schatten op basis van literatuur en expertkennis welke grasopname we verwachten:…”
Section: Methodieken Om Grasopname Te Metenunclassified