2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0632-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failed back surgery syndrome: the role of symptomatic segmental single-level instability after lumbar microdiscectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we relied on clinical criteria of SI which may better correlate with patient outcome after LMD 7,8,10 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, we relied on clinical criteria of SI which may better correlate with patient outcome after LMD 7,8,10 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding is supported by the works of Yorimitsu et al 9 and Schaller 10 who observed that the majority of patients suffering from severe LBP and SI were young. This might be explained by a more active degenerative process in younger patients 9 , a more advanced stage of DDD leading to a lower risk of post-operative instability in older patients 10 , and more frequent involvement of younger patients in intense physical activity 9 .…”
Section: Clinical Prognosticatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The paper by Schaller et al [21] presents a retrospective review of 2,353 patients who had a microdisectomy, and in this group 12 required a subsequent operation at a mean of 2 years after the primary procedure. Patients prior to surgery were carefully evaluated for features of ''spinal instability'', using methods of examination that, in the main, have not been validated as indicating abnormal translational movement, but certainly may indicate that the patients were not uncomplicated disc herniations, but had features of a more significant disturbance of spinal function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%