2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failed newborn hearing screens as presentation for otitis media with effusion in the newborn population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Doyle et al (2004) related that fails on the hearing screening for TOAE also can be attributed to the alterations of the middle (secretor otitis) and that the children who present secretor otitis during the neonatal period present bigger risk to develop chronic middle otitis during the first year of life. Boone et al (2005), evaluating the presence of alterations of middle ear in a population of 76 newborns that failed in the hearing screening, identified 64,5% of children with middle otitis, and from these, 34.7% needed ventilation tubes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doyle et al (2004) related that fails on the hearing screening for TOAE also can be attributed to the alterations of the middle (secretor otitis) and that the children who present secretor otitis during the neonatal period present bigger risk to develop chronic middle otitis during the first year of life. Boone et al (2005), evaluating the presence of alterations of middle ear in a population of 76 newborns that failed in the hearing screening, identified 64,5% of children with middle otitis, and from these, 34.7% needed ventilation tubes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Objective middleear assessment can best be performed by tympanometry. Tympanometry measures relative changes in tympanic membrane movement as air pressure is varied in the external auditory canal.…”
Section: Tympanogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newborns and infants with mild conductive hearing loss often refer hearing screenings resulting in higher false positive rates that lead to added expenses, decreased programme efficacy, and increased chances of anxiety for parents 1, 2. Even though significant efforts have been made to reduce the number of false positive results by comprehensive screening protocols, the question of compromised middle ear functioning due to otitis media with effusion, a transient middle ear effusion, or middle ear cavities containing mesenchyme and not fully pneumatized at birth, has not yet been addressed sufficiently 3 . Middle ear fluid or middle ear effusion is a common diagnosis among newborns and infants, with infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) especially prone to the condition 4,5 . A recent study has pointed out that otitis media with effusion may contribute up to 67% of the false positive newborn hearing screens 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle ear fluid or middle ear effusion is a common diagnosis among newborns and infants, with infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) especially prone to the condition 4,5 . A recent study has pointed out that otitis media with effusion may contribute up to 67% of the false positive newborn hearing screens 5 . The presence of middle ear fluid severely diminishes and even obliterates otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and, while auditory brainstem response (ABR) screening is more robust with fewer failures due to mild middle ear conduction pathologies, it may still lead to a refer result in more serious cases [6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%