2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure analysis of 1D lattice truss composite structure in uniaxial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scope of this initial strength testing is admittedly limited, but it provides a useful benchmarking point for the direct stiffness method, as will be seen. A much more thorough treatment of failure modes in composite truss structures is given in [8]. In this case, the torsional loading was primarily being carried by the shear web, as would be expected, and the portions of the shear web under compression are the likely points of failure initiation as they are prone to buckling.…”
Section: Torsional Strength Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scope of this initial strength testing is admittedly limited, but it provides a useful benchmarking point for the direct stiffness method, as will be seen. A much more thorough treatment of failure modes in composite truss structures is given in [8]. In this case, the torsional loading was primarily being carried by the shear web, as would be expected, and the portions of the shear web under compression are the likely points of failure initiation as they are prone to buckling.…”
Section: Torsional Strength Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These supports must be able to translate along the length of the truss as it is wound, and must remain there until the polymer matrix bonding the tows together is fully cured. Other work by the same research group and others has used internal mandrels to make the same basic structure, [6][7][8] and have considered winding based methodologies instead of braiding, but in this case the non-continuous cross section, visible in Figure 2, and the need to support the material at each node creates captive mandrel geometries, which requires the use of complex multi-component mandrel solutions that can be disassembled, collapsed, or dissolved for removal after the composite has cured. Other researchers have considered modified forms of braided truss structures that greatly simplify the geometry, but they do so using a circular cross section mandrel which creates curved segments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is necessary to determine the optimal parameters of lattice structure for a specific application [28,29]. Qianqian et al [30] developed theoretical and finite element methods for analyzing one-dimensional lattice truss composite structures under uniaxial compression and found that the buckling modes significantly depend upon the length of the column. Magnucki et al [31] derived an analytical solution for investigating critical buckling load of a unidirectional isotropic beam made of porous material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lattice truss composite structures (LTCSs) are known for their high specific stiffness and strength 1,2 and potential applications in aeronautic and astronautic structures. LTCSs can be divided into the one-dimensional (1D) LTCS, [3][4][5] two-dimensional (2D) LTCS, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and three-dimensional (3D) LTCS. 1,2 Among them, 2D LTCSs have been well developed in last two decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%