2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure analysis of a high precision deployable reflector in TED test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the corresponding material, ply design and ply angle deviation control, the 2.6m polygonal back structure reflector was manufactured. The thermal deformation test was carried out using the photogrammetric method [12][13], and the equipment was the MPS/FP single-camera industrial photogrammetric system. Test status in the thermal vacuum tank is shown in figure 10.…”
Section: Verification and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the corresponding material, ply design and ply angle deviation control, the 2.6m polygonal back structure reflector was manufactured. The thermal deformation test was carried out using the photogrammetric method [12][13], and the equipment was the MPS/FP single-camera industrial photogrammetric system. Test status in the thermal vacuum tank is shown in figure 10.…”
Section: Verification and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) According to the normal distribution and the required value of ply angle deviation ±δ (δ=0.5°, 1°), it can be generated N sample values of deviation angle with M layers by equation (12) in @Matlab software. In terms of the μ test method [19], take N equal to 100.…”
Section: Thermal Deformation Analysis Based On Normal Distribution Ra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The narrower spot beam demand on the antenna also highlights the importance of accurate pointing; otherwise, system electrical performance may be greatly deteriorated. For example, a sharp reduction of 2 dB is found in a Ku band multibeam antenna as a depointing of 0.12 ° [15]. Usually, pointing error of the antenna consists of deployment repeatability error, alignment error of the satellite platform, assembly error of the antenna, and thermal induced error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%