2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure by design – National mandates and agent control of local land use in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Han and Lai (2012) pointed to the shifting role of the central government, with the once exclusive role of urban economic development replaced by multiple goals that are hard to achieve [37]. Li (2016) pointed to regulatory failure in the central government's failure to control local land use [38]. Dean and Daam-Luhr (2010) likewise pointed to reforms not going far enough to protect rural dwellers' rights [39].…”
Section: Brief Literature Review Of Land Use In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han and Lai (2012) pointed to the shifting role of the central government, with the once exclusive role of urban economic development replaced by multiple goals that are hard to achieve [37]. Li (2016) pointed to regulatory failure in the central government's failure to control local land use [38]. Dean and Daam-Luhr (2010) likewise pointed to reforms not going far enough to protect rural dwellers' rights [39].…”
Section: Brief Literature Review Of Land Use In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-use planners are facing the challenge of striking a balance between food production, economic growth, and natural resource protection [ 39 ]. Given these contradictory goals, China’s current land use policies and plans are ineffective in responding to rapid urbanization, in protecting cultivated land and natural resources, and in protecting the environment [ 64 , 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, towns and villages have captured only 20%-30% profits of land value increment, and farmers obtain 5%-10% of the profits. The local governments take 20%-30% profits and the left, which is 40%-50%, was all grabbed by developers [10] .…”
Section: Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%